Sen. Reid: “Poison Pill” Immigration Amendment Will Get a Vote

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/7513136@N05/3821293202/in/photolist-6PF8ky-6PF8Co-6PF8FY-6Z1fgu-6Z1ftG-71C2Da-72C3Mg-7aZzDg-7gRFyD-7gVCz5-aebSxy-dBtyXr-dBtz1M-7NSZ6y-7X13KP-8TTWyV-cvi5WN-cvi5qy-cvi6kh-cvi7ad-8znABW-8znBf1-8znzKY-7GpvYV-8zjt7t-8zjtcv-8znBxU-7H3MJ3-7Ge2uH-7PPE3M-7PPDTP-7zDTNX-7PSTTC-7PPCqn-8vagt7-7PPCMB-8vagdS-8v7cWR-8v7djF-7PPBRX-9K6x3w-9LTQsM-9GFuzR-9pjGn1-8nzfqS-9Yi6qn-cvi3Fd-cvi3oL-cvi43E-cvhZXU-cvi2nJ">Center for American Progress</a>/Flickr


Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) has called an amendment floated by Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) a “poison pill” that, if passed, could kill the immigration bill. Nevertheless, Reid will allow the controversial border security measure, which Sen. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) recently called “very reasonable,” to come to a floor vote as early as Wednesday before he moves to end debate and bring the full bill to a vote.

Cornyn’s amendment would require the implementation of four security measures before immigrants could be granted permanent legal status: complete surveillance of the southern border, a 90 percent apprehension success rate for people who cross the border illegally, a mandatory national E-Verify system, and an operational biometrics security system—typically fingerprint identification—at United States air and sea ports. The amendment is strongly opposed by Democrats, as well as some Republicans, who say it would be overly expensive and logistically difficult to implement, and would therefore effectively cripple the 13-year path to citizenship that is the centerpiece of the Senate bill.

“If [the Gang of Eight doesn’t] take reasonable measures to deal with the border security concerns of the American people, I don’t think we’re going to get an immigration bill,” Cornyn told reporters Tuesday afternoon. “So that itself will be a poison pill.” Reid said Tuesday that he believed the bill, as currently written, already has enough votes to surmount a filibuster. However, the Gang of Eight wants the bill to pass with at least 70 votes to put pressure on the GOP-led House to take action.

The current Senate bill already calls for round-the-clock surveillance of the southern border, a 90 percent apprehension rate within five years, and a mandatory E-Verify system. But those measures don’t serve as triggers that would preclude immigrants from getting legal status before they are implemented. Republicans have clamored for triggers as part of a broader bipartisan compromise, although the conservative Heritage Foundation has come out strongly against Cornyn’s amendment, calling it a “fig leaf” that still puts legal status first and foremost.

Earlier, Cornyn said that his immigration amendment held true to “Ronald Reagan’s old adage: Trust but verify.”

“Trust but Verify” is also the name of a Reagan-inspired amendment authored by Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) that would require the Department of Homeland Security to provide annual reports to Congress to show that the border is “provably secure” before undocumented immigrants would be given provisional legal status. Paul’s amendment is one of nine other amendments that will likely get a vote Wednesday. Both Cornyn and Paul have expressed some willingness to work toward a broader compromise, although many Democrats think Cornyn has been insincere.

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.