How Extreme Will Future Heat Waves Be?

<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/egenerica/3259686484/sizes/m/in/photolist-5Y3Ke7-iaesA-wPjS4-drBscU-drBgBR-fDtwn-fDtwi-8otPEZ-8otPoa-9eTavx-ash7Ha-asjDcq-asjGsA-ash68t-asgY6R-asjsR5-asgJYX-asjqzj-asjjcC-asgSRp-ash2DD-asgWmD-asgRdv-asgUze-dEdAR8-6AVmNS-4VR9rH-isPWU-2LPsq-5XYBHp-5Y41jq-dEgpfD-23jLYR-adAzYa-fcEc9-5Yf5cV-ascA9J-Zhg83-jbh6p-asgCZv-8iD3Wm-8op2Tf-drBoyB-wF2rX-9BBe5F-8h8VJg-dN7EU-arFo5V-66RFvC-8gFtD2-cuUuYN/">FiDalwood</a>/Flickr

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


This story first appeared on the Guardian website and is reproduced here as part of the Climate Desk collaboration.

Dim Coumou and Alexander Robinson from the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research have published a paper in Environmental Research Letters (open access, free to download) examining the frequency of extreme heat events in a warming world.

They compared a future in which humans continue to rely heavily on fossil fuels (an IPCC scenario called RCP8.5) to one in which we transition away from fossil fuels and rapidly reduce greenhouse gas emissions (called RCP2.6). In both cases, the global land area experiencing extreme summer heat will quadruple by 2040 due to the global warming that’s already locked in from the greenhouse gases we’ve emitted thus far.

However, in the low-emissions scenario, extreme heat frequency stabilizes after 2040 (left frames in Figure 1), while it becomes the new norm for most of the world in the high-emissions, fossil-fuel-heavy scenario (right frames in Figure 1). (Click here for a larger version.)

Maps

Figure 1: Multi-model mean of the percentage of boreal summer months in the time period 2071-2099 with temperatures beyond 3-sigma (top) and 5-sigma (bottom) under low emissions scenario RCP2.6 (left) and high emissions RCP8.5 (right).

Coumou and Robinson looked at the frequency of rare and extreme (3-sigma, meaning 3 standard deviations hotter than the average) and very rare and extreme (5-sigma) temperature events. Three-sigma represents a 1-in-370 event, and 5-sigma is a 1-in-1.7-million event.

As shown in the video below from NASA, summer temperatures have already begun to shift significantly toward more frequent hot extremes over the past 50 years. What used to be a rare 3-sigma event has already become more commonplace.

Coumou and Robinson point out that these 3-sigma events have tended to have very damaging consequences:

[M]ost of the 3-sigma extremes that have occurred in recent years resulted in serious impacts to society, causing many heat-related deaths, massive forest fires or harvest losses.

Coumou pointed to the Moscow summer heat wave of 2010 as a good example of a damaging 3-sigma extreme heat event. Thousands died during that heat wave, and the associated drought cut Russia’s wheat crop by 40 percent, cost the nation $15 billion, and led to a ban on grain exports, causing food prices to rise globally.

In the Moscow region the average temperature for the whole of July was around 7°C [13°F] warmer than normal—it was around 25°C [77°F]. In some parts, temperatures above 40°C [104°F] were measured.

As Figure 1 above shows, if we continue to rely heavily on fossil fuels (right frames), these extreme heat events will occur throughout the summer for most of the global land area by the late 21st century, especially in the tropics. Currently, around 5 percent of the world’s land mass is experiencing a 3-sigma event at any one time during the summer months.

In the high greenhouse gas emissions scenario, most of Africa, Central America, and northern South America will experience 3-sigma extreme heat events for close to 100 percent of the summer. They will become the norm. Even extreme 5-sigma heat events, which are currently exceptionally rare, will become relatively commonplace, especially near the equator.

On the other hand, in the scenario where we take major steps to reduce human greenhouse gas emissions (left frames in Figure 1), 3-sigma events will still be relatively rare by the late 21st century, especially outside of the tropics. Extreme 5-sigma events will become somewhat more commonplace near the equator, but will remain fairly rare occurrences globally.

In short, damaging summer extreme heat events are going to become more commonplace, but just how much more commonplace is up to us. While it’s difficult to determine how climate change will impact some types of extreme weather (tornadoes, for example), the link between global warming and heat waves is quite clear. Increasing global temperatures will make (and have already made) extreme heat events more commonplace.

The longer we continue to rely on fossil fuels and the higher our greenhouse gas emissions, the more extreme heat we’ll lock in. If we manage to take serious action to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions, we can limit global warming to a level where extreme heat events will become more commonplace, but to a level we can manage to adapt to.

If we continue our reliance on fossil fuels and associated greenhouse gas emissions growth, we’ll commit ourselves to a world where today’s most extreme heat waves become the norm, and future extreme heat makes today’s heat waves look downright balmy.

It’s in our hands which future scenario becomes reality. It’s like one of those choose-your-own-adventure books, but real. Which future will we choose?

More MotherJones reporting on Climate Desk

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.