MLK Would Have Supported Assad, and Other Tidbits From Dueling Syria Protests in DC

Tim Murphy


The first thing members of Congress saw when they returned to work on Monday was dueling protests on Capitol Hill between supporters and opponents of a proposed military intervention in Syria. Both sides consisted largely of first- and second-generation Syrian-Americans. But only one faction went so far as to hold up Bashar al-Assad—who stands accused of using chemical weapons to kill 1,400 civilians on top of myriad other atrocities—as an emblem of peace and justice.

I spotted Hassan Mohammed, decked out in a biker glove made from a Syrian flag, a Syrian-flag sweatband, and red Abercrombie & Fitch sweatpants, and waving a six-foot-by-four-foot banner of the Assad. “He’s my president, No. 1!” said Mohammed, who has dual citizenship and drove down from New York to express his support. “I voted for him in 2007. I’m going to vote for him again.”

But what about his conduct during the civil war? “It’s not a civil war yet,” Mohammed insisted. And while civilian casualties are unavoidable in this non-civil-war, he’s confident that no chemical weapons have been used by the regime—it’s simply not practical. “He doesn’t have to use it; he can kill the same amount of people with different weapons.”

Milad Tabshi, who drove down from Pennsylvania, had a stern expression on his mustachioed face. “The Syrian regime did not commit any atrocities against the Syrian people,” he said. “It’s Western propaganda. It’s nonsense. It’s a war provoked, orchestrated by the West aimed to destroy every nation in the Middle East and take its natural resources.”

Here are three additional nuggets of wisdom from Assad’s defenders…

President Obama should borrow from Assad’s example and think of the children:

“American tax $$$ should fund US education not Al Qaeda.” Tim Murphy

Despite whatever else you may have heard, Assad is much loved:

Tim Murphy

Martin Luther King Jr. would have supported Assad. (At least he has company.):

Tim Murphy

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate