Trump to Serious Political Consultant: You’re Hired!

Donald Trump’s entire Iowa operation is a dude with a pickup truck.

<a href="https://www.flickr.com/photos/gageskidmore/5440606864/in/photolist-9hHrit-9kwYUn-5ae5pK-oep83L-cJjFP-9hKoKX-9hKqAn-9hNuLJ-9hHrVT-dS85iC-jDzuj6-9hLxAs-9hNxeN-afUurt-9hLwSC-9hLx6s-9hLvZL-9hLwdw-9hHqq6-9hHqDv-9v62wo-9hKrun-9hNwCN-9hNvKd-9hNwi1-9hKpmZ-9hNwso-9hKrPH-9hKraP-9hKrkx-ekAiEk-5KnqeT-HkLZL-jUPKkF-e21BG2-4wXpSa-7hrC5a-iiVQvs-9hHpJr-9hNvWh-9hKpTt-9hNvfQ-9hNvzC-9hKoVK-9hKp4g-eULu15-5yHWVR-2oQiC-9KUYs-xRyc1">Gage Skidmore</a>/Flickr

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Another presidential election season has begun. So, naturally, Donald Trump is once again trolling the United States with the prospect he will run for the highest office in the land. But unlike his past presidential flirtations, Trump’s intentions this time around appear to be possibly—perhaps, maybe, conceivably—a bit more serious. That’s because the publicity-loving real estate tycoon has managed to convince one of Iowa’s most sought-after conservative operatives to join his campaign—that is, if there is a campaign.

In February, Trump announced that Chuck Laudner would be joining his “growing team” as Trump “strongly consider[s] running for president in 2016.” Trump told the Des Moines Register that Laudner was “my first choice, my second choice, and my third choice” to lead his Iowa efforts (if there are to be Iowa efforts). “I’ve liked Chuck from day one,” he said.

For Trump, there’s a lot to like about Laudner. The 49-year-old is a former chair of the state GOP and served as Rep. Steve King’s chief of staff. Laudner solidified his national reputation in 2012, when he ran Rick Santorum’s Iowa operation. Laudner drove the candidate to each of Iowa’s 99 counties in his Dodge Ram pickup that became famous (at least within Iowa) as the “Chuck Truck.” Santorum edged out Mitt Romney to win Iowa. Laudner was hailed.

So the question for political observers is not why Trump would choose Laudner, but why Laudner would choose Trump?

Conservative media buzzed when the news broke of Trump’s big get. Iowa conservative radio host Steve Deace told Breitbart, “Trump signing Laudner—who had other options—that would be an instant signal that he is serious…This is a major coup for Donald. Major coup.” One of the “other options” Laudner apparently passed up was working again with his old pal Santorum, who appears to be preparing for a 2016 bid. Laudner’s decision to join Trump is also curious on another level. After all, the thrice-married Trump is hardly the poster boy for the Christian conservative values Laudner has long promoted. Laudner did not respond to requests for comment.

After years of working for conservative causes and candidates in the Hawkeye State, Laudner has forged strong ties to a network of social conservatives who wield outsize influence in Iowa’s much-watched presidential caucus. In 2010, Laudner helped design a recall campaign targeting three Iowa State Supreme Court justices who had ruled in favor of gay marriage. A powerful coalition of religious activists came together to back the effort and, after spending nearly a million dollars, it successfully unseated the judges. Progressives argued that the result was a dangerous politicization of the state judiciary, subjecting it to the pressures of interest groups and the effects of political spending.

Jeff Link, a longtime Iowa Democratic operative, says partnering with Trump seems an unusual choice for Laudner. The billionaire has been an outspoken critic of President Barack Obama—and remains a leading birther—but his record on conservative social issues has been inconsistent at best. Trump identifies himself as a “Sunday church person,” and has recently opposed same-sex marriage and abortion, but not too long ago he was pro-choice and supported robust partner benefits for same-sex couples.

When Laudner signed on with Santorum in 2011, he declared, “I’m not looking for someone who checks the pro-life box on a survey. I want a pro-life hero who has been in the arena moving the ball.” That’s not a description that fits Trump.

One obvious speculation is that Trump attracted Laudner with his big bucks. But Craig Robinson, a top conservative journalist in Iowa, wrote in 2011 that money doesn’t concern Laudner: “There is never any sort of negotiation on salary, benefits, hours, or even a title. In fact, those are the things that turn him off.” Laudner indicates he believes Trump is the right person to galvanize the conservative vote. He told the Des Moines Register, “Someone of his stature, his fame and the size of his audience? It should be our target to convince those people that we should move the political center to the right.” He added that Team Trump operates rather smoothly: “It’s not like any other political shop I’ve ever worked in. It’s all business.”

Whatever the reason Laudner has joined forces with Trump, this move has political observers inside and outside Iowa wondering if this time the reality-show tycoon plans to do more than tease.

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate