Forget the Polls. Google Tells Us Who Really Won the GOP Debate.

A spin through the world’s biggest search engine shows what people think about the Republican candidates.

RJ Sangosti/Denver Post/Zuma

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

A few dominant narratives emerged from Wednesday night’s Republican presidential debate in Boulder, Colorado. One: The GOP and its supporters hate the media. Two: Donald Trump polls well with the GOP base, regardless of his debate performance. And three: Jeb Bush’s campaign might be toast.

But there’s also something to be learned from Google, the company that seems to know what we’re thinking before we even think it. The folks at Google Trends compiled a mound of data during the debate, looking at real-time searches of the candidates, what people are trying to learn about each of them, and the sheer dominance of Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina during the night’s undercard debate that preceded the main event.

One Google interactive looked at which candidate people searched for after searching for another candidate. In other words, after people looked up Trump, whom did they search for next? The answer: Ben Carson. Click on a candidate below to see the related candidates.

Taking a step backward, let’s look at the top GOP candidates from Google searches before the debate.

Clearly, Trump was winning that race. But it shifted after the debate, with Carson and Sen. Marco Rubio of Florida gaining some ground.

That seems to coincide with one of the story lines from the debate: Rubio handled questions about his voting absences and finances fairly well, and he may have supplanted Bush as the go-to establishment candidate in the race.

Here’s how those searches played out in real time.

You can see Trump and Carson starting strong, with Rubio in third place. But as the debate progressed, Rubio held on, never falling below the fourth position. By the end, he was in second place behind Trump. But the biggest questions people had about Rubio weren’t exactly the deepest ones.

To be fair, questions about the other questions are on the same level.

The questions might seem silly, but they can be revealing. Trump’s wealth and business acumen have been key selling points during the campaign, so it’s only natural that people would ask Google about his money. Conversely, with someone like Graham, people are wondering what he’s even doing in the race:

But it’s not all bad for Graham, according to the Google Trends data. Take a look at real-time searches during the undercard debate on Wednesday night:

If this is any indication, Graham is doing a good job in at least one area: getting attention.

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate