Weapons Companies’ Stocks Surge After Paris Attacks

Defense stocks rally on news of a new offensive against ISIS.

US Air Force F-35 fighter jetRex Features/AP Images


When the New York Stock Exchange opened Monday morning, less than three days after Islamic State terrorists attacked in Paris, five leading American weapons manufacturers saw their stock prices jump. Fox Business attributed the bump to a “reaction to the attacks in France.” Over the weekend, French President Francois Hollande had announced that his country would “lead a war which will be pitiless” against ISIS and launched a “massive” airstrike on its stronghold in Syria.

Shares of Lockheed Martin, known for its Hellfire missiles and its lead role in the troubled $1.5 trillion F-35 project, jumped 3.5 percent. Raytheon, manufacturer of Tomahawk missiles used in air strikes against ISIS, climbed 4.1 percent. Northrop Grumman, which in October landed a $55 billion deal to build the next stealth bomber, saw a 4.4 percent rise. Both General Dynamics, maker of F-16s, and Boeing, whose Small Diameter Bombs and Joint Direct Attack Munitions have been used in the air campaign against ISIS, ended the day with increases of 1.9 and 1.3 percent, respectively. On the first day of trading after the Paris attacks, the Dow Jones average rose slightly less than 1.5 percent.

The five companies’ stock continued to do well on Tuesday:

Change in stock price for Boeing (BA), Northrop Grummon (NOC), General Dynamics (GD), Raytheon (RTN), and Lockheed Martin (LMT) since November 13, the day of the Paris attacks Google Finance

Does likelihood of an expanded military response to ISIS signal a boom for the arms industry? Aerospace and defense industry analysts at Stifel, a brokerage and investment banking firm headquartered in Missouri, penned an industry update on Monday, writing that the Paris attacks are likely to lead to “stronger support for defense spending and ongoing operations in the Middle East.” Overall, that’s good news for defense contractors.

But historically, the real driver behind defense spending has been troop deployment, not political sentiment, Stifel notes, and support for redeploying American troops in the Middle East is scant. “We would be surprised to see any significant shift in strategy from President Obama and expect instead to see an acceleration and broadening of current efforts—an increase in aerial attacks and a possible increase in the number of special ops forces deployed,” the industry update noted. Nonetheless, “We view the most likely outcome as increased political support for defense spending and for national security/terrorism to become a greater focus of the 2016 election cycle dialogue, which is likely to create positive headlines for defense companies.”

FACT:

Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2019 demands.

We Recommend

Latest

Give a Year of the Truth

at our special holiday rate

just $12

Order Now

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.