Donald Trump Dominated Last Night’s GOP Debate, According to Google

Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, and Jeb Bush followed far behind.


The above exchange, edited together by MSNBC, might represent signs of life for the flagging campaign of former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush. The early front-runner with the $100 million war chest saw his poll numbers peak in early July, but they’ve been declining ever since. A big reason for that has been withering attacks of Donald Trump, who has successfully branded Bush as “low energy” and too nice to make the tough decisions necessary to run the country.

So during Tuesday night’s debate, Bush’s successful parry of Trump’s attacks got a lot of attention. When Bush told Trump that he wouldn’t be able to “insult your way to the presidency, that’s not going to happen,” it was the debate’s top moment on Facebook, according to the Hill.

Social-media engagement and internet trends might not tell us who’s going to win the nomination, but they do offer some insights into who’s succeeding in getting the attention of voters. The Google Trends team put together a series of graphics showing how Google search terms trended before, during, and after the debate. If that’s any indication, Trump had the best night, with Sens. Ted Cruz and Marco Rubio following.

First, take a look at the most searched candidate leading up to the debate:

That might not be too surprising given all the media attention Trump gets, but polls have shown that media attention tends to coincide with Republican base support. When people search for Trump on Google, here’s what they’re asking:

The data also shows what issues people are searching for related to Trump. Take a look:

During the debate, Google tracked real-time search data. ISIS and the internet—the latter due to increased talk about encryption and law enforcement access to data, as well as Trump’s proposal to shut down parts of the internet to thwart terrorists—led the way. But you can see that China, Russia, immigration, Trump, and the Kurds were on people’s minds during the debate. This graphic charts interest in those topics from 6:20 p.m. ET, during the undercard debate, to the end of the main debate, just after 11 p.m. ET. Take a look:

The morning after the debate, Trump still dominated Google search traffic, with more searches than the rest of the field combined. Cruz and Rubio followed. Here’s the pattern from early morning December 16:

When people are searching specific issues on Cruz, they’re searching for his stance on gun control, immigration, ISIS, abortion, and Muslims. But as far as specific questions, here’s what people were asking about the senator from Texas in the week leading up to Tuesday’s debate:

And here are the top questions asked about Rubio for that same time frame:

People are also searching for information on Ben Carson, another outsider candidate who had surged in the polls but has seen a drop in support after the terrorist attacks in Paris. The top trending questions on Carson in the week before the debate don’t necessarily reflect well on the retired neurosurgeon:

And let’s not forget CNN’s Wolf Blitzer, the main moderator of last night’s debate. People were Googling questions about him, too:

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

It is astonishingly hard keeping a newsroom afloat these days, and we need to raise $253,000 in online donations quickly, by October 7.

The short of it: Last year, we had to cut $1 million from our budget so we could have any chance of breaking even by the time our fiscal year ended in June. And despite a huge rally from so many of you leading up to the deadline, we still came up a bit short on the whole. We can’t let that happen again. We have no wiggle room to begin with, and now we have a hole to dig out of.

Readers also told us to just give it to you straight when we need to ask for your support, and seeing how matter-of-factly explaining our inner workings, our challenges and finances, can bring more of you in has been a real silver lining. So our online membership lead, Brian, lays it all out for you in his personal, insider account (that literally puts his skin in the game!) of how urgent things are right now.

The upshot: Being able to rally $253,000 in donations over these next few weeks is vitally important simply because it is the number that keeps us right on track, helping make sure we don't end up with a bigger gap than can be filled again, helping us avoid any significant (and knowable) cash-flow crunches for now. We used to be more nonchalant about coming up short this time of year, thinking we can make it by the time June rolls around. Not anymore.

Because the in-depth journalism on underreported beats and unique perspectives on the daily news you turn to Mother Jones for is only possible because readers fund us. Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism we exist to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we need readers to show up for us big time—again.

Getting just 10 percent of the people who care enough about our work to be reading this blurb to part with a few bucks would be utterly transformative for us, and that's very much what we need to keep charging hard in this financially uncertain, high-stakes year.

If you can right now, please support the journalism you get from Mother Jones with a donation at whatever amount works for you. And please do it now, before you move on to whatever you're about to do next and think maybe you'll get to it later, because every gift matters and we really need to see a strong response if we're going to raise the $253,000 we need in less than three weeks.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate