Trump Tries to Win Wisconsin by Insulting It

How better to impress voters than to tell them their state sucks?

Ricky Bassman/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Donald Trump hasn’t been shy about trashing the current state of the country while running for president. His Make America Great Again slogan comes with an implicit suggestion that America’s not doing so hot at the moment, and he often criticizes President Barack Obama for weakening various institutions, such as the military.

But in the run-up to the Wisconsin primary, he’s taken that tactic even further, bashing the state he’s trying to win on Tuesday.

Trump has made a habit of dissing the current condition of things in Wisconsin to promise a brighter future when he’s president. It’s his spin on “negging,” a concept popularized by men who style themselves as “pick-up artists” to attract women by subtly insulting them. The online scene behind it, predictably, is a wasteland of misogyny.

Trump, known for his lothario treatment of women in his personal life, seems to be adopting the strategy when trying to convince Wisconsinites that he deserves their vote. During a Saturday rally in Racine, near Milwaukee, Trump just couldn’t help himself as he found new ways to attack Wisconsin.

“I’ve got statistics on Wisconsin that are unbelievable,” Trump said, breaking from his typical off-the-cuff speech to glance at some notes. “You think we’re doing nicely and everybody thinks they’re doing well, but I have some statistics. You could write out some of the numbers—you look at your manufacturing jobs, you know better than anybody how they’ve gone to other countries. They’re gone. I mean, they’re literally gone.”

Trump pointed out that Wisconsin has had slower job growth than the national average. “Twenty-five percent of manufacturing jobs have left since 2000,” Trump said. “No one knows that.”

“Get me a job,” a man in the crowd shouted.

“We’ll get you a job,” Trump responded. “We’re going to get a lot of jobs, we’re bringing our jobs back from China. We’re bringing our jobs back from Mexico.”

Normally, candidates do everything they can to ingratiate themselves with voters as they campaign, sampling regional cuisines and complimenting the local scenery. Even as Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders campaign on trashing Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker’s agenda, they are sure to pair those critiques with praise for the character of the state. Why might Trump be so eager to break from that tradition? Part of it might be his struggles in the polls, with Sen. Ted Cruz currently running far ahead of him in the state. Trump’s bombast hasn’t played well in the land of Midwestern nice, with the conservative establishment in the state rejecting his rhetorical stylings. The influential talk radio hosts around Milwaukee put Trump through the ringer when he called in last week, and Walker, unpopular statewide but still beloved by the Republican base, threw his support behind Cruz.

Walker’s decision to back Cruz appears to have stung Trump particularly, although Trump rarely wins endorsements from elected officials. During a press conference on his plane as he headed to Wisconsin last week, Trump dismissed Walker’s relevance to local reporters. “Look, I beat him very badly,” Trump said. In Racine, Trump bragged that Walker had once gifted him a plaque at his Manhattan office, and pondered whether he should release it as an effort to embarrass Walker.

Trump said Walker’s leadership had hurt Wisconsin, a state he once held in higher regard. “I thought Wisconsin was doing well,” Trump said, “and it’s not true! It’s oookay, it’s in the middle of the pack. Nothing spectacular.”

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate