Justice Department Opens Inquiry Into Arizona Election Debacle

Thousands of voters waited hours to cast ballots.

Many voters waited for hours to cast ballots in the March 22 Arizona elections.Matt York/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


The Department of Justice is looking into the election-day chaos that transpired in Arizona’s most populous county when the state held its primaries on March 22. Thousands of voters waited hours to cast ballots, and some voters complained that their registration information had changed and essentially blocked them from voting.

In the letter dated April 1, Chris Herren, the chief of the DOJ’s voting section, asked Maricopa County Recorder Helen Purcell to explain what went wrong.

“We have received reports that a number of Maricopa County voters waited several hours to cast a ballot on election day,” Herren wrote. “We also understand that there were allegations of disproportionate burden in waiting times to vote on election day in some areas with substantial racial or language minority populations.” To that end, Herren asked the county for several pieces of information:

  • A list of polling locations and the precincts they served.
  • The rationale used to decide to go from 200 polling places to 60, and any information on how that decision was weighed against its potential disproportionate impact on minority areas.
  • Information about whether voters could cast ballots at any of the 60 locations, and how those rules were publicized ahead of the election.
  • A list of registered voters.
  • A list of who voted in the March 22 election, and how they voted (in person that day, in person during early voting, or by mail).
  • Information about the staff working the polls.
  • Information about the provisional ballots cast on March 22.
  • Information on when the last poll closed and when the last ballot was cast on March 22.
  • Information on how voters’ party registration was recorded by election registration software, and an examination of allegations that some voters’ party affiliations were switched without their knowledge.
  • A response to the overall state of the March 22 election, specifically the long wait times.

Karen Osborne, the county’s elections director, told the Arizona Republic that the DOJ’s letter is simply a “request for information,” and that “throughout the years we’ve had requests like this.” Osborne said the county will answer all the questions and make them public.

Dena Iverson, a spokeswoman for the DOJ, declined to answer questions about whether this represents the beginning of a formal investigation. Phoenix Mayor Greg Stanton, a Democrat, asked the DOJ to get involved the day after the election.

The DOJ has asked the county to answer the questions by April 22. Read the full letter below:

 

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.