The Public Now Has Access to Hundreds of Videos Documenting Shootings by Chicago Police

The new database also includes audio recordings and official reports related to Taser and use of force incidents.

Brett Gustafson/Wikimedia Commons

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

 

In a move meant to boost transparency and regain public trust, the Chicago Independent Police Review Authority (IPRA) made public an online database Friday that includes videos, audio recordings, police reports, and other documents related to 101 police misconduct cases currently under investigation by the agency. The move came at the urging of the Police Accountability Task Force put in place by mayor Rahm Emmanuel last December amid political fallout from the release of a video showing the fatal police shooting of black teen Laquan McDonald.

The database includes more than 300 videos from body cameras, dashboard cameras, and bystander videos, plus audio recordings from 911 calls and police radio transmissions. The materials cover 74 police-shooting incidents that occurred between January 2011 and May 2016, as well as other cases involving use of force, including against suspects in police custody. Eight of the shooting incidents occurred this year—a year in which homicide rates in Chicago have soared. [Warning: Graphic footage follows.]

Log#1058573-CHI-R-00003832 from IPRA Chicago on Vimeo.

In February, the task force recommended that the city release videos of police shooting incidents to the public within 60 days of the incident, which Emanuel said he would work to ensure was “the rule” going forward. The task force also recommended the department release videos for police use of Tasers that result in death or serious injury, as well as for other use of force incidents that result in serious injury while a suspect is in police custody.

In a press conference on Friday, the head of the police review agency, Sharon Fairley, called the release of the materials a “historic” and “tremendous effort” at transparency. She said it would not have an impact on the investigations. Emanuel said that the database was “one piece of a much larger effort” to restore communities’ trust in law enforcement, and Chicago Police Superintendent Eddie Johnson said he believed the database would “go a long way in promoting transparency.”

The database is without precedent, says Karen Sheley, director of the police practices project at the ACLU of Illinois. “I’m not aware of other cities or departments that have this extensive of an online presence for their video or audio associated with police misconduct allegations,” she said. Sheley praised the launch of the database as the kind of step toward transparency that “I think everyone is hoping will be the cure” to the crisis of confidence between the public and Chicago police. “This is a dramatic change from what the police department and the city did before in relationship to videos and information about these kinds of investigations,” she said. But it isn’t the only step needed, Sheley added, to regain trust and ensure police accountability. “We need more transparency about the entire IPRA investigation process, including the outcomes of their investigation.”

This article has been updated to reflect changes to the Mother Jones style guide.

 

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate