The NRA Isn’t Changing Its Stance on the Terrorism Watchlist

But it will meet with Donald Trump anyway.

Mark Humphrey/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.


Just hours after presumptive Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump announced he would meet with the NRA to discuss “not allowing people on the terrorist watch list, or the no fly list, to buy guns,” the organization gave its response: we’ll meet Trump, but we’re sticking to our guns.

“The NRA’s position on this issue has not changed,” said Chris W. Cox, the executive director of the NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action, in a statement. “The NRA believes that terrorists should not be allowed to purchase or possess firearms, period. Anyone on a terror watchlist who tries to buy a gun should be thoroughly investigated by the FBI and the sale delayed while the investigation is ongoing.” The group issued a similar statement in the wake of last year’s terrorist attack in Paris.

An NRA spokesman told Mother Jones the statement simply supported the existing checks that take place whenever someone on a watchlist attempts to buy a gun. If a gun buyer’s background check shows she’s on a watch list, the government is able to step in, investigate, and prevent the sale—but that almost never happens. More than 90 percent of purchases are approved, according to data from the Government Accounting Office.

The NRA is instead focused on pushing for a way to remove people more easily from watchlists. “Due process protections should be put in place that allow law-abiding Americans who are wrongly put on a watchlist to be removed,” the group wrote in the statement. The NRA argues that people on watchlists often wrongly end up there because of broad and secretive standards, and it’s able to call on an unusual allies to help make that case. The ACLU and the Council on American Islamic Relations are two other prominent organizations that agree with the NRA’s stance on civil liberties grounds.

Hina Shamsi, the director of the ACLU’s National Security project, told the Huffington Post that watchlists would be an acceptable way to limit gun access only if there were a “major overhaul of the watch-listing system because it uses vague and overbroad standards, the result of which innocent people are blacklisted without a fair process to correct government error.”

Nevertheless, President Obama complained earlier this month that “we’re allowed to put [people] on the no-fly list when it comes to airlines, but because of the National Rifle Association, I cannot prohibit those people from buying a gun.” Democrats are also pushing to ban gun sales to people on watchlists in the wake of Sunday’s massacre in Orlando, launching a filibuster in the Senate on Wednesday to demand new gun laws.

THE BIG PICTURE

You expect the big picture, and it's our job at Mother Jones to give it to you. And right now, so many of the troubles we face are the making not of a virus, but of the quest for profit, political or economic (and not just from the man in the White House who could have offered leadership and comfort but instead gave us bleach).

In "News Is Just Like Waste Management," we unpack what the coronavirus crisis has meant for journalism, including Mother Jones’, and how we can rise to the challenge. If you're able to, this is a critical moment to support our nonprofit journalism with a donation: We've scoured our budget and made the cuts we can without impairing our mission, and we hope to raise $400,000 from our community of online readers to help keep our big reporting projects going because this extraordinary pandemic-plus-election year is no time to pull back.

THE BIG PICTURE

You expect the big picture, and it's our job at Mother Jones to give it to you. And right now, so many of the troubles we face are the making not of a virus, but of the quest for profit, political or economic (and not just from the man in the White House who could have offered leadership and comfort but instead gave us bleach).

In "News Is Just Like Waste Management," we unpack what the coronavirus crisis has meant for journalism, including Mother Jones’, and how we can rise to the challenge. If you're able to, this is a critical moment to support our nonprofit journalism with a donation: We've scoured our budget and made the cuts we can without impairing our mission, and we hope to raise $400,000 from our community of online readers to help keep our big reporting projects going because this extraordinary pandemic-plus-election year is no time to pull back.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.