Unelected Texas Bureaucrats Have Opened a New Front in the War Against Abortion Providers

They want fetal remains to be buried or cremated.

<a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-1177274p1.html">Marc Bruxelle</a>/Shutterstock

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


With very little in the way of a public announcement, Texas health officials have proposed a new abortion restriction that requires providers to cremate or bury fetal remains. 

The move came days after the Supreme Court issued an order that struck down important provisions of Texas’ omnibus anti-abortion bill that closed more than half the clinics in the state. The fetal-remains amendments to the health code appeared in the Texas Register on July 1, which triggered a 30-day period for public comment.

This set of rules does not come from the state’s deeply conservative state legislature, but from the Texas Health and Human Services Commission. In Texas, state agencies have a special power granted by the Legislature—”specific rulemaking authority”—that says they can adopt rules without lawmaker approval.

The proposal would no longer allow abortion providers to dispose of fetal tissue as medical waste in sanitary landfills. Instead it would require that all remains be either cremated or interred. Renee Clack, director of Health Care Quality Section, determined that the new disposal methods would not require small clinics to incur additional costs, according to the Texas Register. However, the clinics currently dispose of medical waste through a third-party waste disposal service, so finding a way to comply with the regulation will at least result in an administrative burden.

The rules would apply to all fetal remains, regardless of gestation stage.

“The Health and Human Services Commission developed new rules to ensure Texas law maintains the highest standards of human dignity,” health commission spokesman Bryan Black told the Texas Tribune.

He added that the final rules are expected to take effect in September.

Arkansas, Indiana, and Georgia have similar laws on the books. Ohio, South Carolina, and Mississippi have all considered requirements to this effect as well. Recently, The Atlantic spoke with the vice president of policy for Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, who said it’s been difficult to find partnerships with funeral homes to comply with Indiana’s legislation—a lot of businesses in the red state have refused to work with them.

Republican Gov. Greg Abbott’s spokesperson, Ciara Matthews, told the Texas Tribune that the new rules have his approval, and he hopes they will be written into law when the Legislature reconvenes in January.

“Governor Abbott believes human and fetal remains should not be treated like medical waste, and the proposed rule changes affirms [sic] the value and dignity of all life,” Matthews said in a statement.

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate