Court Rules That North Carolina Districts Are “Racially Gerrymandered” and Unconstitutional

But voters will still cast ballots in these illegal districts in November.

Chris Keane/Zuma

A trio of judges ruled Thursday that 28 of North Carolina’s 170 state legislative districts are unconstitutional “racial gerrymanders” and ordered the state Legislature to redraw the maps. But the change won’t come in time for the November elections, leaving voters to cast ballots in districts whose boundaries have been deemed to violate the Constitution.

The case, Covington v. the State of North Carolina, centers on whether state Republicans relied too heavily on race when they redrew the legislative districts in 2011. Thursday’s opinion, written by Judge James A. Wynn Jr., found that “race was the predominant criterion in drawing all of the challenged districts.” That alone doesn’t make a congressional district unconstitutional, but Wynn wrote that the state did “not [show] that their use of race to draw any of these districts was narrowly tailored to further a compelling state interest.”

The ruling comes less than a week after Common Cause, a public advocacy group, sued the state over alleged racially gerrymandered congressional districts. It comes less than two weeks after a separate trio of federal judges struck down a host of North Carolina voting restrictions, including voter ID requirements, cuts to early voting, and the banning of same-day voter registration. North Carolina Gov. Pat McCrory, a Republican, said he was going to appeal that ruling, but that hasn’t happened yet. A separate case, McCrory v. Harris, is also challenging the state’s congressional districts.

Thursday’s ruling orders the state Legislature to redraw the legislative districts. But given that the November elections are less than four months away and state House and Senate primaries based on those districts have already taken place, the court declined to order a postponing of the 2016 general election and will instead “allow the November 2016 elections to proceed as scheduled under the challenged plans, despite their unconstitutionality.” The court acknowledged that the plaintiffs in the case, “and thousands of other North Carolina citizens, have suffered severe constitutional harms stemming from [North Carolina’s] creation of twenty-eight districts racially gerrymandered in violation of the Equal Protection Clause,” and ordered the state Legislature to redraw the boundaries during its next legislative session.


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot. That's what Mother Jones CEO Monika Bauerlein tackles in her annual December column—"Billionaires Are Not the Answer"—about the state of journalism and our plans for the year ahead.

We can't afford to let independent reporting depend on the goodwill of the superrich: Please help Mother Jones build an alternative to oligarchy that is funded by and answerable to its readers. Please join us with a tax-deductible, year-end donation so we can keep going after the big stories without fear, favor, or false equivalency.


as we head into 2020 is whether politics and media will be a billionaires’ game, or a playing field where the rest of us have a shot.

Please read our annual column about the state of journalism and Mother Jones' plans for the year ahead, and help us build an alternative to oligarchy by supporting our people-powered journalism with a year-end gift today.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.