Growing Chorus of Republicans Calls for Sessions to Recuse Himself From Russia Probe

One by one, the list is getting longer, after a report that Sessions lied about contacts with the Russian ambassador.

Jim Loscalzo/CNP/ZUMA

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.


Congressional Republicans are coming around to the idea that the Trump administration’s ties to Russia need to be investigated by someone other than Attorney General Jeff Sessions, following a Washington Post report that Sessions lied during his confirmation hearing about interactions with the Russian government. When Sessions testified before the Senate last month, he said he “did not have communications with the Russians” during the presidential campaign. In fact, the Post reported Wednesday night, he met twice with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak, once last September in a private meeting in Sessions’ Senate office.

A trickle of Republicans are now saying that Sessions should no longer have a role in any investigation into improper contacts between Trump’s staff and Russian state actors during last year’s campaign.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), chair of the House Oversight Committee, called on Sessions to clarify his contacts with Russia and step aside from the investigation:

Rep. Justin Amash (R-Mich.) called Sessions out on Twitter:

Sen. Rob Portman (R-Ohio) sent out a statement Thursday morning saying Sessions needs to step aside. “Jeff Sessions is a former colleague and friend, but I think it would be best for him and for the country to recuse himself from the DOJ Russia probe,” Portman’s statement said. Rep. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.), Rep. Patrick Meehan (R-Pa.), Rep. Leonard Lance (R-N.J.), and Rep. Raul Labrador (R-Idaho) have also said Sessions should recuse himself. Sen. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.) stopped just short of calling on Sessions to step aside. “Obviously he is going to need to clarify,” Flake told Reuters, “and likely recuse himself from any investigation with regard to the Russians.”

House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) briefly joined the calls for recusal when he said it would be “easier” if Sessions removed himself. But he quickly walked that back Thursday morning, going on Fox to say, “I’m not calling on him to recuse himself.”

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) told Mother Jones on Thursday that he thinks Sessions would need to recuse himself if allegations of improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia are borne out. “You got an attorney general who is my dear friend, who is closely involved with the presidential campaign,” Graham told Mother Jones. “If there’s credibility to the allegations of inappropriate contacts between a foreign government and the campaign, in my view, for the good of the integrity of the system, somebody should pursue that—not Jeff Sessions.”

Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine) issued a statement Thursday afternoon calling on Sessions to recuse himself “to ensure public confidence in the Justice Department’s investigation.”

This story is being updated as more Republicans announce their views on Sessions.

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate