A Closer Look at the Supposed “Tremendous Medical Costs” of Transgender Soldiers

The military spends 15 times more on erectile disfunction.

PeteMuller/Getty/iStock

President Donald Trump announced on Wednesday that he would ban transgender soldiers from the military, reversing an Obama-era policy that had allowed them to serve openly.

“After consultations with my Generals and military experts, please be advised that the United States Government will not accept or allow Transgender individuals to serve in any capacity in the U.S. Military,” the president tweeted. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender [soldiers] in the military would entail.” The announcement surprised Pentagon officials and came as Defense Secretary Jim Mattis was on vacation.

In 2016, the Obama administration announced transgender soldiers could serve openly for the first time in history, and in September, the Pentagon said it would also pay for their gender-related surgeries. At the time, Trump—who dodged the Vietnam War draft five times—described these policies as “ridiculous.” “We’re going to get away from political correctness,” he said.

Riley Dosh came out as transgender in December, during her last year at West Point. The 22-year-old, who graduated from the academy in May, dreamed of becoming an Army officer. On Wednesday morning she was woken up by a call from a BBC reporter who asked whether she had seen Trump’s announcement on Twitter about the ban. “It’s devastating, really, to see such an important decision come down so suddenly, without any warning,” she told me. She thought immediately of the thousands of transgender people who are already serving, including some of her friends. “They don’t know if they should come to work tomorrow—they don’t know if they’ll get fired tomorrow. They’re concerned about their careers,” she says.

 

Some Republicans have argued that transgender people might make the military less combat-ready. But when the RAND Corp. studied this question recently, it disagreed: Across all military service branches, it found that only an estimated 10 to 130 active trans soldiers would be less deployable every year because of gender transition medical treatments. That’s a drop in the bucket compared with the thousands of non-transgender soldiers who are kept from the front lines for other health reasons—37,000 in the Army alone in 2015.

Trump’s tweets suggested that trans soldiers rack up “tremendous medical costs” while they are on duty. While the Pentagon’s budget is hundreds of billions of dollars, the estimated cost for transition-related care is about $5.4 million, according to the RAND Corp. Here’s one way to put that in perspective:

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.