Betsy DeVos’ Civil Rights Chief Said “90 Percent” of Campus Rape Claims Are Bogus. The Backlash Was Swift.

Fire her, says Sen. Patty Murray.

Alex Brandon/AP

On Monday, Sen. Patty Murray (D-Wash.) called on Betsy DeVos to remove the Education Department’s acting civil rights chief for her “callous, insensitive, and egregious” comments about campus sexual assaults and her rollbacks of civil rights enforcement. 

Candice Jackson, the official in question, told the New York Times last week that “90 percent” of campus assault accusations “fall into the category of ‘we were both drunk,’ ‘we broke up, and six months later I found myself under a Title IX investigation because she just decided that our last sleeping together was not quite right.'” Jackson, who once complained that she faced discrimination because she was white, later apologized for her remarks at a listening session with sexual assault survivors—which included students accused of sexual assault, a men’s rights group, and university officials. 

In a statement, Sen. Murray said Jackson’s remarks, despite the apology, “crossed a serious line and highlighted her clear biases in this area in a way that, to me and many women and men across the country, should disqualify her from service.”

“This is the last straw,” Murray wrote, “it is not my only concern.” 

The call for Jackson’s ouster comes amid correspondence between Democratic senators and DeVos expressing alarm over her department’s civil rights enforcement policies. The dispute began in February, when the department rescinded Obama-era guidelines clarifying protections for transgender students who wanted to use school bathrooms matching their gender identity.  

In June, Murray and 33 other Democratic senators wrote to DeVos expressing disappointment in the department’s actions and requesting information on its enforcement activities. Jackson had sent a memo to her field directors that effectively scaled back complaint investigations: Field offices would no longer have to notify the DC mothership of all complaints received. Nor would the satellite offices be asked to look into whether individual an complaint fit into any larger pattern. 

In a second memo, Jackson outlined how civil rights officials should handle complaints involving transgender students. She encouraged investigators to assert “subject matter justification” in deciding which allegations to investigate. In other words, in evaluating each case separately, the department’s officers could choose to investigate an allegation involving gender-based harassment but dismiss one related to the denial of bathroom access based on gender identity. 

The senators also urged DeVos to increase funding for her civil rights division—the department had proposed the opposite: $1.7 million in cuts. In June, the US Commission on Civil Rights announced a two-year investigation of federal civil rights enforcement under Donald Trump, calling out the Department of Education specifically. “These proposed cuts are particularly troubling in light of Education Secretary Betsy DeVos’ repeated refusal in Congressional testimony and other public statements to commit that the Department would enforce federal civil rights laws,” the panel wrote

In a July 11 response, DeVos wrote that the civil rights department under President Obama “had descended into a pattern of overreaching, of setting out to punish and embarrass institutions rather than work with them to correct civil rights violations and of ignoring public input prior to issuing new rules.” On her watch, DeVos added, the department would not issue “new regulations via administrative fiat.” Rather, it would revert to its role as “a neutral, impartial, investigative agency.” 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.