Trump’s Contradicting DACA Remarks Are Confusing Everyone Except for His Base. They’re Pissed.

We’re outlining the head scratching tick-tock for you.

Dominique A. Pineiro/ZUMA

President Donald Trump and Democrats appear to have agreed on a framework for a legislative replacement for Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals—the Obama-era program that shielded nearly 800,000 undocumented immigrants from the threat of deportation and allowed them to legally work. 

Senate and House minority leaders Chuck Schumer (D-N,Y.) and Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) on Wednesday announced that they had agreed to hammer out a deal with the president that protected Dreamers but would not include funding for a border wall—at least not yet. The next day, Trump all but confirmed the announcement on Twitter, but disputed the assertion that any “deal” had been brokered. His subsequent statements on the issue throughout Thursday only added to the confusion.

“We’re working on a plan for DACA, people want to see that happen,” Trump told reporters before leaving for Florida on Thursday. “You have 800,000 young people brought here no fault of their own. We’re working on a plan, we’ll see how it works out. But we’re going to get massive border security as a part of that.”

When asked about the construction of a border wall, he said that would “come later.” He then added, “We’re right now renovating large sections of wall, massive sections.” 

Trump’s series of contradictory statements have ignited a fierce backlash among his supporters. His remarks, which echoed his tweets earlier Thursday morning calling for empathy regarding DACA recipients, added to the mounting anger from his anti-immigration fans. 

Prominent members of his base were also divided over what possible amnesty would look like under the Trump administration. When asked if he supported amnesty, Trump responded on Thursday, “The word is DACA.”

“We’re not looking at citizenship,” Trump said. “We’re not looking at amnesty. We’re looking at allowing people to stay here.” 

Conservative commentator radio host Bill Mitchell was less harsh, claiming supporters threatening to abandon Trump over a possible deal with Democrats on DACA were bluffing:

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.