The Trump Administration Set a Record-Low Refugee Cap. Now It’s Falling Far Short of It.

The United States is on track to let in only half the refugees allowed under Trump’s cap.

Refugees arrive in Greece last month. The Trump administration has slashed the number of refugees the United States will accept.Angelos Tzortzinis/ZUMA

In September, President Donald Trump cut the annual limit on the number of refugees who can come to the United States from 110,000 to 45,000—the lowest level on record. But as Mother Jones reported last month, refugee advocates believe it’s highly unlikely that the Trump administration will even reach that number, due to other restrictive policies that make it hard for refugees to gain entry to the country.

Now their concerns are backed up by data from the State Department’s Refugee Processing Center, showing that 1,860 refugees came to the United States last month. That is about half the rate needed to hit the 45,000-person cap. The Obama administration admitted admitted nearly 85,000 refugees in fiscal year 2016, and 8,355 came to the country last November. 

Kay Bellor, a vice president at the Lutheran Immigration and Refugee Service, says the country is “absolutely not” on track to hit the cap. Melanie Nezer, a senior vice president at HIAS, a Jewish group that helps resettle refugees, says HIAS is “very concerned” about the numbers. She believes there is time to catch up, but doing so requires a “real commitment” by the White House that has yet to be seen.  

The religious composition of refugees coming to the United States has also changed since Trump took office. In October, the Trump administration effectively banned most refugees from 11 countries for the next 90 days. Nine of those 11 are majority-Muslim nations.

Last November, 40 percent of refugees coming to the United States were Muslim, compared to just 10 percent last month. Nezer says the low percentage of Muslims refugees is “troubling but not surprising” in light of the president’s clear intent “to keep refugees out of the US based on their belonging to a religion that he does not like.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.