House Oversight Committee Launches Investigation Into Rob Porter

But some of Rep. Trey Gowdy’s comments already cast doubt that the probe will pressure the White House.

The House oversight committee has launched an investigation into Rob Porter’s employment at the White House and plans to look into how the former staff secretary, who resigned last week amid domestic abuse allegations, was able to handle classified information without proper security clearance. 

Committee chairman Rep. Trey Gowdy confirmed the investigation on Wednesday, but only when repeatedly pressed by CNN’s Alisyn Camerota on what the committee was willing to do in order to look into the scandal. “What matters to me is that we are directing inquiries to people that we think have access to information we don’t have,” Gowdy said. “You can call it official, you can call it unofficial. Those words don’t mean anything to me.” (Rep. Elijah Cummings, the ranking Democratic member of the oversight committee, had previously criticized Gowdy for blocking efforts to seek answers on Porter and the White House’s shifting narratives.)

“What means something to me is I’m going to direct questions to the FBI that I expect them to answer, and if they don’t answer them then they’re going to have to give me a really good reason,” Gowdy continued.

On Tuesday, FBI Director Christopher Wray revealed during testimony before the Senate intelligence committee that the FBI had warned the White House about Porter four times before the abuse accusations became public last week. Wray’s timeline stood in stark contrast to the White House’s continued refusal to disclose who at the White House knew about Porter’s abuse allegations, and when they knew.

In the wake of the engulfing scandal, the White House has repeatedly appeared to blame the FBI and “career officials” for any potential lapses in Porter’s background check.

Cummings on Wednesday welcomed Gowdy’s decision to launch an investigation into the matter, but stressed that the integrity of the probe remained to be seen. “I commend Chairman Gowdy for taking this preliminary step. But obviously—obviously—the credibility of this investigation will be judged by how thorough it is in obtaining documents and interviewing witnesses, and how bipartisan it is in its conclusions,” he said.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate