Trump Just Endorsed Arming Teachers at a Meeting With Survivors

“If you had a teacher who was adept at firearms, it could very well end the attack very quickly.”

President Donald Trump speaks as he hosts a listening session with high school students, teachers and parents at the White House on Wednesday. Carolyn Kaster/AP

At the White House on Wednesday, seated with President Donald Trump, six students from Majory Stoneman Douglas High School spoke of their pain in the aftermath of a shooting at their school that left 17 people dead. Parents called for more work to bolster safety measures inside and outside the classroom, prompting a father whose daughter was killed in last week’s shooting to ask President Trump: “How many children have to get shot?”

Wednesday’s listening session included the president, the six survivors, parents of Stoneman Douglas students, parents of the Sandy Hook and Columbine victims, and Education Secretary Betsy DeVos, who recently told conservative talk show host Hugh Hewitt that the shooting should spark a “robust conversation around tracking and tackling mental health issues.” 

During Wednesday’s listening session, Trump expressed support for allowing teachers and staff to carry concealed weapons as long as they receive special training. Trump used the story of Aaron Feis, the assistant football coach who was killed while protecting a student at Stoneman Douglas, to illustrate why he thinks teachers should be armed. If Feis had a gun, Trump said, “he wouldn’t have had to run—he would’ve shot and that would’ve been the end of it.” 

Trump spent some time on his good-guy-with-a-gun talking point, which is a popular NRA myth that Mother Jones has debunked in past coverage of mass shootings. 

“If you had a teacher who was adept at firearms, it could very well end the attack very quickly,” Trump told the group. “If these cowards knew that the school was well guarded from the standpoint of having professionals with great training, I think they wouldn’t go into the school to start off with. I think it could very well solve your problem.”

Trump also promised that the administration would be “very strong” as they consider measures to toughen background checks and improve mental health resources at schools. 

Andrew Pollack, whose daughter, Meadow, was killed in last week’s shooting, urged unity to make schools more safe for students. “I’m very angry that this keeps happening,” Pollack said. “I’m not going to sleep until it’s fixed.” 

“I’m pissed cause my daughter I’m not going to see again,” Pollack added later. “She’s not here. She’s at King David Cemetery.”  

Sam Zeif, a student at Stoneman Douglas, recounted the moments during the shooting when he texted family members to tell them he may never see them again. Zeif’s brother was in the classroom a floor above, where his teacher Scott Beigel was killed

“I lost a best friend,” Zeid said. “I’m here to use my voice because I know he can’t.”

Zeif, who turned 18 a day after the shooting, pointed out that he could go into a store and “buy a weapon of war.”

“How is it that easy to buy this type of weapon? How have we not stopped this after Columbine, after Sandy Hook? It’s still happening,” he said. “Let’s never let this happen again.” 

Nicole Hockley, whose son Dylan was killed in the Sandy Hook shooting, disagreed with Trump’s argument that teachers should be armed—she would “rather arm teachers with the knowledge on how to prevent shootings from happening in the first place.” She called for funding for mental health and school safety programs instead.

“No parent should go through this,” Hockley said. “Every parent who sends their kid to school should know without a question in their mind that they are going to be coming home that day.” 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.