White House Refuses to Answer When John Kelly Knew About Top Aide’s Abuse Allegations

“He had not seen images prior to the statement.”

Ron Sachs/ZUMA

The White House on Thursday refused to say when the president’s chief of staff John Kelly became aware of the domestic abuse allegations against Rob Porter, the top aide who resigned Wednesday after two of his former wives went public with abuse accusations.

During an afternoon press briefing Thursday, deputy press secretary Raj Shah would only say that Kelly became “fully aware” of the allegations after graphic images of one of Porter’s ex-wives with a black eye were published in the Intercept on Wednesday. It remains unclear what Kelly knew before he saw the images and when he first learned about the allegations. Numerous reports say that Kelly knew about the accusations for months.

The timeline is further exposing Kelly to outrage over his continued defense of Porter: On Tuesday, after the Daily Mail published a story about the accusations, the chief of staff called him a “man of integrity.” Then, after the images became public on Wednesday, Kelly released a statement in the evening saying that he was now “shocked” by the allegations, but refused to take back his praise for Porter: “I stand by my previous comments of the Rob Porter that I have come to know since becoming Chief of Staff, and believe every individual deserves the right to defend their reputation,” Kelly said. “I accepted his resignation earlier today, and will ensure a swift and orderly transition.”

Shah’s presser on Thursday also fueled additional questions over the fact that Porter lacked a full security clearance and that the FBI had previous knowledge of the abuse claims. Shah said that a background check on Porter was never completed, despite him being in the job for a year. Shah indicated that Porter’s interim security clearance still allowed him to handle classified information, but distanced the White House with what he described as the FBI’s processes.

The White House on Thursday did offer a rare display of contrition, saying that it was “fair to say we all could have done better over the last few hours or last few days in dealing with this situation.”


Mother Jones was founded as a nonprofit in 1976 because we knew corporations and the wealthy wouldn't fund the type of hard-hitting journalism we set out to do.

Today, reader support makes up about two-thirds of our budget, allows us to dig deep on stories that matter, and lets us keep our reporting free for everyone. If you value what you get from Mother Jones, please join us with a tax-deductible donation today so we can keep on doing the type of journalism 2019 demands.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.