After a Mother Jones Investigation, a Right-Wing Albanian Party Attacks

And the Russian embassy there calls the magazine part of a “dirty news campaign”

On Tuesday, Mother Jones published a lengthy investigation about a mysterious Russian-linked firm that hired a former Trump campaign aide named Nick Muzin to work in the United States to help the right-wing Democratic Party of Albania during the country’s 2017 parliamentary elections. The story zeroed in on Biniatta Trade, a Scotland-based shell company that paid Muzin $150,000, and perhaps more, to help the DPA and its chairman, Lulzim Basha. According to corporate filings in the United Kingdom, the two Belize-based shell companies that created Biniatta Trade were linked to other firms controlled by Russian nationals. It was a complicated trail, and here’s a chart to help explain what Mother Jones uncovered:

The bottom-line question was this: Did Russians use the political system in the US to meddle in Albanian politics?

We tried to track down these Russian-linked companies and their representatives—examining Russian corporate records, sending a reporter to several addresses in Moscow, and calling and emailing entities and individuals in Russia, Ukraine, Canada, and the United States. We never obtained a complete answer. But our question hit a nerve. Over the last two days, several media outlets in Albania reprinted pieces of our story, as Albanian politicians and the Russian embassy in Tirana denounced the article—and Mother Jones.

The Democratic Party of Albania issued a statement alleging that the ruling Socialist Party paid Mother Jones, which it called “second-hand media,” to “forge facts.” The DPA’s statement denied any ties to Russian-linked shell companies. “The Democratic Party has not had and has no direct or indirect links with Russian individuals or companies,” said the party. Yet records filed with the US Justice Department state that Biniatta Trade paid Muzin, the lobbyist, to do work on behalf of the DPA.  

 In a statement to the independent Albanian newspaper, Shqiptarja, Mother Jones said, “The charge that Mother Jones received payment from Edi Rama for publishing this article is absurd. We never accept payment for an investigation under any circumstances and certainly did not in this case.”

Soon, Shqiptarja interviewed the reporters who worked on the piece, landing us on the front page:

Controversy over the story has continued. One publication alleged Mother Jones coverage was biased because it has received $1.16 million in donations from Democratic donor George Soros. (Mother Jones has not received support from any of Soros’ organizations in years, and when it did the amount was far less than this.) One DPA member currently serving in Albanian parliament wrote on Facebook that Mother Jones must be tied to US socialists—implying the magazine was in the bag for the governing Socialist Party of Albanian—because the magazine’s namesake, Mary Harris Jones, was a labor leader tied to the American socialist movement in the early 20th century.

And the Russian embassy in Tirana joined in. The article did not report any Russian government connection to these shell companies. But the embassy issued a statement saying the story “alleged Russian interference in the parliamentary elections of 2017.” It then blasted the piece as “unworthy of detailed comments” and part of a “dirty news campaign unleashed against Russia by Western media.” The embassy added: “We emphasize that, unlike a number of Western states, Russia firmly adheres to the principle of non-interference in the internal affairs of other countries, including Albania.”

The Russian embassy urged the Albanian press to dispute the story: “We also express hope that the opinion of the American authors does not coincide with the position of newsrooms among Albanian media that reprinted the opus.”

Image and chart credits: Getty Images; Chris Kleponis/CNP/ZUMA; Twitter; Jodi Hilton/NurPhoto/ZUMA; DPA/Facebook

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate