Judge Tells Scott Walker He Can’t Block Special Elections in Wisconsin

Walker had refused to hold elections for legislative seats vacant since December.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker, with Vice President Mike Pence and House Speaker Paul Ryan, speaks at the White House last July.Alex Brandon/AP

Fight disinformation. Get a daily recap of the facts that matter. Sign up for the free Mother Jones newsletter.

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker must hold special elections this spring to fill two vacant state legislative seats, a judge ruled Thursday. Walker has tried to prevent the elections from taking place in two districts that could flip from Republican to Democratic control at a time of political backlash against President Donald Trump across the country. 

Walker has a “plain and positive duty” to hold the elections, ruled Dane County Circuit Court Judge Josann Reynolds, who was appointed by Walker in 2014. “To state the obvious, if the plaintiffs have a right to vote for their representatives, they must have an election to do so,” Reynolds said from the bench.

Two Republican members—Sen. Frank Lasee and Rep. Keith Ripp—left the legislature in December to join Walker’s administration, but the governor refused to schedule special elections, claiming they would be a waste of money since the legislature was set to adjourn in March. A Democratic group led by former Attorney General Eric Holder sued the governor on behalf of Wisconsin voters in the two districts, noting that the Wisconsin constitution says legislative vacancies “shall be filled as promptly as possible by special election.” Holder called Walker’s refusal to hold the elections “an affront to representative democracy.”

Voters from the two districts testified in court that they had been denied representation as a result. “We have nobody representing the interests of our Senate district right now and that upsets me,” said Jennifer Meyer of the town of Scott, near Green Bay, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. “We’re entitled to representation.” 

“I think it’s important that voters have a voice in their government,” said another voter, Desiree Frank, from Fond Du Lac County.

The attorney for the plaintiffs, Elisabeth Frost, called it “textbook voter disenfranchisement,” according to the Associated Press. “I can’t imagine a more clear case of disenfranchisement of the right to vote,” she said. The judge agreed.

The political tide in Wisconsin appears to be turning toward Democrats, after Trump notched a surprise victory there in 2016. In January, Democrat Patty Schachtner scored a shocking upset in northwest Wisconsin, winning a special election for a state Senate seat by 11 points. The district had been in Republican hands since 2000 and was carried by Trump by 17 points in 2016. Wisconsin Democrats said Walker was refusing to hold special elections for the two vacant legislative seats because he was afraid Democrats would win them, too.

The ruling said Walker must issue an order within a week scheduling the elections. 

HERE ARE THE FACTS:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

ONE MORE QUICK THING:

Our fall fundraising drive is off to a rough start, and we very much need to raise $250,000 in the next couple of weeks. If you value the journalism you get from Mother Jones, please help us do it with a donation today.

As we wrote over the summer, traffic has been down at Mother Jones and a lot of sites with many people thinking news is less important now that Donald Trump is no longer president. But if you're reading this, you're not one of those people, and we're hoping we can rally support from folks like you who really get why our reporting matters right now. And that's how it's always worked: For 45 years now, a relatively small group of readers (compared to everyone we reach) who pitch in from time to time has allowed Mother Jones to do the type of journalism the moment demands and keep it free for everyone else.

Please pitch in with a donation during our fall fundraising drive if you can. We can't afford to come up short, and there's still a long way to go by November 5.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate