Trump Says He’s “Super Interested” in a Universal Flu Vaccine. His Budget Says Otherwise.

President Trump, who in the past was skeptical of immunizations, has now expressed enthusiasm about the development of a universal flu vaccine. On Monday, in a STAT News interview with Bill Gates, the philanthropist reported that in a meeting last month, he had told Trump that it might be possible to prevent all strains of the flu with a single vaccine. The president, he said, was “super interested,” and even called Food and Drug Administration commissioner Scott Gottlieb to ask about it.  

That’s quite a departure. In 2015, Trump said, “I don’t like the idea of injecting bad stuff into [my] body,” adding, “I have friends that religiously get the flu shot and then they get the flu.”

(That’s false, by the way. But people often feel some flu symptoms from their body’s immune response to the shot.)

The Trump administration certainly hasn’t prioritized flu immunization research. Although the idea of a universal flu vaccine might be new to Trump, scientists who receive federal funding have been working on it for decades. In February, in the midst of a particularly brutal flu season, I wrote about how woefully underfunded these researchers are, and how the Trump administration had threatened to slash their budgets further.

So does Trump’s alleged enthusiasm bode well for researchers? Michael Osterholm, a flu researcher and the director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, doesn’t want to speculate. “It’s gratifying to see many parties now talking about the need for a game-changing influenza vaccine—we’ve come a long way in this discussion,” he told me. But it’s going to take a lot more than talk. In a recent New York Times op-ed, Osterholm pointed out that while the federal government spends about $1 billion a year on HIV vaccine research, in 2017 it dedicated just $43 million to studying a universal flu vaccine. This is despite the fact that flu now kills far more Americans than HIV/AIDS.

“Just $10 million here and $10 million there is not going to do it,” Osterholm told me. “Tomorrow we could have another pandemic, and we’re going to pay a heavy price if we’re not prepared.”


The more we thought about how MoJo's journalism can have the most impact heading into the 2020 election, the more we realized that so many of today's stories come down to corruption: democracy and the rule of law being undermined by the wealthy and powerful for their own gain.

So we're launching a new Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption. We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We'll publish what we find as a major series in the summer of 2020, including a special issue of our magazine, a dedicated online portal, and video and podcast series so it doesn't get lost in the daily deluge of breaking news.

It's unlike anything we've done before and we've got seed funding to get started, but we're asking readers to help crowdfund this new beat with an additional $500,000 so we can go even bigger. You can read why we're taking this approach and what we want to accomplish in "Corruption Isn't Just Another Scandal. It's the Rot Beneath All of Them," and if you like how it sounds, please help fund it with a tax-deductible donation today.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.