June 16, 2018

Protesters Blast Mike Pence for “Ripping Children From Their Families”

Meanwhile, Trump falsely blames Dems for the immigration policy justified by his top officials.

Natacha Pisarenko/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Outrage continues to rise around the country about the Trump administration’s forced separation of immigrant children from their parents. On Friday, Vice President Mike Pence was interrupted during a tax reform speech in Columbus, Ohio, by protesters who heckled him about the detention of migrant kids along the border: “Why are you ripping children from their families?” one shouted.

According to figures released by the Department of Homeland Security on Friday, at least 1,995 minors have been pulled from their parents over the past six weeks and are being held in detention centers as part of the Trump administration’s new “zero-tolerance policy.”

“It’s cruel!” one demonstrator yelled at Pence as he tried to thank his supporters in the crowd. The action came a day after the American Academy of Pediatrics denounced the forcible separations, saying they could cause “irreparable harm to lifelong development” of the children involved.

Many of those children—many with parents who are being criminally charged for entering the country—are being held in a former Walmart in Brownsville, Texas. On Thursday, the Trump administration announced it would create a temporary tent shelter in the state for more children.

The protest in Columbus was one of many around the country on Friday. In San Francisco, hundreds of demonstrators took to the streets outside an office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

President Donald Trump has been blaming his own administration’s chosen policy on Democrats, the minority party in both chambers of Congress. “I hate the children being taken away,” he told reporters Friday at the White House. “The Democrats have to change their law. That’s their law.” He continued that false claim in a tweet on Saturday morning:

There is no federal law requiring forced separations of immigrant families. 

Unlike the Obama administration, as the New York Times reports, the Trump administration “is treating all people who have crossed the border without authorization as subject to criminal prosecution, even if they tell the officer apprehending them that they are seeking asylum based on fear of returning to their home country, and whether or not they have their children in tow.”

Three top Trump officials have explicitly described why the administration has chosen to implement the policy of separating immigrant children from their parents. Homeland Security Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen described it as “zero tolerance.” Chief of Staff John Kelly talked it up as a “tough deterrent.” And Attorney General Jeff Sessions defended it on religious grounds, backed up by press secretary Sarah Sanders, who told reporters “it is very biblical to enforce the law.”

And late Friday, the Washington Post reported that Trump himself sees the hardcore tactic as a negotiating tool toward the broader immigration policies he wants Congress to enact.

The highly controversial policy may nonetheless be ineffective. “We’ve seen no evidence that it is deterring families from entering,” Jennifer Nagda, policy director for the Young Center for Immigrant Children’s Rights at the University of Chicago, told NPR. “The families who are coming to the US are fleeing situations of extraordinary violence. When they are leaving, they are just trying to get to safety. From our experience, the last thing any of them anticipated was having their children taken from them.”

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate