These Republican Candidates Think Family Separation Is a Winning Issue

Meet the GOPers who spent the week campaigning to separate families at the border.

West Virginia GOP Senate candidate Patrick Morrisey speaks at a press conference on June 5, 2018.Craig Hudson/Charleston Gazette-Mail via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

On Monday, retiring Republican Sen. Bob Corker (R) took a stand against the Trump administration policy that separates children from parents who are prosecuted for entering the United States without authorization. “We can all agree that innocent children should be protected and not used for deterrence,” the Republican senator said in a statement.

But Tennessee Rep. Marsha Blackburn, the front runner in the Republican primary to replace Corker, did not share his views. Instead, Blackburn expressed sorrow for the separated families but blamed “liberals” who “would not pay to enforce our immigration laws or build appropriate facilities for asylum seekers.” She did not say whether she disagreed with the Trump administration’s policy.

President Trump signed an executive order on Wednesday that ends the separation of families at the border, something Senate Republicans had begun advocating for earlier in the week: On Tuesday, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) said all Senate Republicans—including the six who are up for reelection—endorsed a bill that would keep parents and children together in detention as courts consider their cases.

But several Republicans running for office have taken a different tack: They’ve remained silent on the family separation policy, or have voiced support of it.

Some candidates like Blackburn have toed a careful line. Leah Vukmir, one of the Republicans aiming to unseat Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wis.) similarly agreed that “of course families shouldn’t be separated,” but declined to say whether the family separation policy should be changed. Vukmir capitalized on the opportunity to discuss a need for immigration reform, telling a Wisconsin news channel that “people are taking advantage of our generosity in this country” and America is “a nation of laws and we have to stand up and uphold those laws.”

But other candidates have been vocal in their support. Rep. Lou Barletta (R-Pa.), an immigration hardliner who faces an uphill battle in his race against incumbent Sen. Bob Casey (D-Pa.), defended the policy, claiming the separation was no less harsh than what happens to American citizens who enter the criminal justice system. “Should you or I commit a criminal act this afternoon after we’re done with this interview, we’re going to be separated from our families,” he explained to a Pittsburgh reporter. “I don’t think we should have separate laws for people who come in the country illegally and other laws for American citizens.” Barletta also said the policy served as a strong deterrent for would-be undocumented immigrants. “If people knew when they came here what would happen,” he said, “we would not have this situation.”

Corey Stewart, who last week became the GOP nominee to face off against Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine (D), has long been known for his fiery attacks on undocumented immigrants. On the subject of family separation, he told a Virginia news outlet that he thinks “the president’s policy is correct,” and took to Twitter to wonder if “the kids are #LeftistTerrorist props?” Stewart also told MSNBC that separating children was “unavoidable policy” and in the “best interest of the United States.”

West Virginia attorney general and GOP senate candidate Patrick Morrisey, meanwhile, slammed competitor Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.V.) for co-sponsoring a bill that would outlaw family separation except in very specific cases. Morrissey said the bill gave “special privileges” to, among others, “child traffickers” and  would “encourage the use of vulnerable children as shields to illegally cross the border in greater numbers.” (It’s a line the president used lately himself.)

Not all GOP candidates share this view. Mitt Romney, the 2012 Republican presidential nominee running to replace Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) has called himself “more of a hawk on immigration” than the president, but Romney told voters in Utah on Monday that the images of from the children detention centers had been “pretty disturbing,” and said he thinks “we should go back to the setting where we’re not ripping children away from their parents.” Florida Gov. Rick Scott, who’s aiming to unseat Sen. Bill Nelson (D-Fla.), took a similar stance, condemning the practice in a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Alex Azar, who’s agency is responsible for the children’s detention. “This practice needs to stop now,” he wrote.

Even as candidates stand divided today, President Trump’s ever-evolving position on the matter will likely bear significant influence on candidates’ rhetoric. So far in 2018 primaries, Republican candidates have been rewarded for out-Trumping one another, especially those running in states where Trump won in 2016. Much of that action has hinged on candidates’ stances on immigration, which has emerged as a wedge issue across the GOP primary races. But the president’s inconsistency on the subject may be a tricky thing for candidates to follow: though Trump told reporters Wednesday “we’re looking to keep families together, it’s very important,” the policy, of course, was of his own creation.

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate