Trump Invokes 9/11 to Justify ICE While Judge Mulls Family Reunification

“The government is at fault for losing several hundred parents.”

Activists protest ICE and the Trump administration's immigration and detention policies in Los Angeles on July 21.Ronen Tivon/NurPhoto via ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A federal judge in San Diego is set to rule this weekend on a request by the American Civil Liberties Union for a restraining order that would prevent the Trump administration from deporting newly-reunified families for one week.

US District Judge Dana Sabraw last week temporarily blocked deportations of families that have been reunited after children were separated from their parents. In a hearing Friday, according to news reports and the ACLU, he said he will consider imposing a new seven-day delay to allow them time to consider whether they want to abandon their hopes for asylum and depart the United States as a family, or leave their children behind in hopes they will receive asylum. Government attorneys called the additional delay unnecessary arguing that families have had sufficient time consider their options while they were detained.

Federal agencies have scrambled to reunite 1,820 children separated from their parents at the border since President Trump reversed course on his family separation policy last month. Federal lawyers said in court that as of the Thursday deadline set by Sabraw, 1,442 children had been returned to their parents, while another 378 were discharged into “other appropriate circumstances.” More than 700 additional children reportedly remain in federal hands, while many of their parents have already been deported without their children. The ACLU argued Friday that 120 parents who had agreed to waive reunification with their child didn’t understand what they were signing and needed more time consider the decision.

Sabraw said in court that “the government deserves great credit,” for their reunification efforts thus far, while also faulting them for initially imposing the policy without sufficient planning. “The government is at fault for losing several hundred parents in the process,” he said.

On Saturday Trump tried to seize the offensive on immigration policy. In a video posted on Twitter, the president renewed his attacks on Democrats over calls by some lawmakers for the abolition of Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE. Trump reminded his viewers that ICE was created as part of a federal reorganization following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks that, he emphasized, “were carried out by foreign nationals who exploited our immigration laws.”

ICE, however, has nothing to do with the patrol of US borders, which is the responsibility of agents in US Customs and Border Protection. Still, Trump argued that ICE’s abolition would cause open borders and crime, warning that ultimately, “We wouldn’t even have a country.” 

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate