Former Trump Campaign Aide Suggests Trump Supported Meeting Russians

Lawyers for George Papadopoulos try to prove his usefulness to prosecutors by throwing Jeff Sessions under the bus.

FILE - In this Dec. 15, 2017, file photo, President Donald Trump sits with Attorney General Jeff Sessions during the FBI National Academy graduation ceremony in Quantico, Va. Evan Vucci/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Lawyers for a former Trump campaign adviser say that both Attorney General Jeff Sessions and the candidate favored the idea of a meeting between Vladimir Putin and the campaign. Sessions had said, in sworn testimony to Congress, that he opposed the proposal to meet with the Russian president. 

The new details come from court documents filed late Friday night by the lawyers of George Papadopoulos, President Trump’s one-time foreign policy adviser who pleaded guilty in October to lying to the FBI about his contacts with Russian government agents. Papadopoulos may have been the first person in Trump’s orbit to learn that the Russians had a massive trove of emails damaging to Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign. And he was the first person charged by special counsel Robert Mueller as part of his probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign.

He’s scheduled to be sentenced on Sept. 7 and faces up to six months in jail. As part of those proceedings, Papadopoulos’s lawyers are attempting to persuade a judge to keep him out of jail on the grounds that he was simply lying to try to save his career—and possibly Trump’s presidency—not to further any sort of Russian plot.

In asking for leniency, Papadopoulos suggests that he’s been helpful to the special counsel’s office investigating Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential campaign. As evidence, his lawyers say that he told investigators that when he proposed arranging a meeting with Russian president Vladimir Putin, Trump “nodded with approval,” and that now-Attorney Jeff Sessions, who was in the room, “appeared to like the idea and stated that the campaign should look into it.” Prosecutors have said that in fact Papadopoulos was not particularly helpful with the investigation and that his lies to the FBI seriously damaged the work of the special counsel. In his new sentencing memo, his lawyers portray him as a hapless climber, who at 28-years-old was innocently entangled in a web of international affairs beyond his understanding.

Politico notes:

The defense filing often refers to Papadopoulos by his first name alone—an approach that seems aimed at portraying him as a naif surrounded by far more sophisticated players. At one point, the submission refers to Papadopoulos—who was 28 at the time of his encounters in London—as “young George.” Intentionally or not, some passages seem to evoke the “Curious George” children’s stories, where a wide-eyed monkey is constantly amazed and surprised by his more savvy human companions.

His lawyers write that Papadopoulos says that he lied to the FBI to “save his professional aspirations and preserve a perhaps misguided loyalty to his master.” Read the entire document here.

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate