Judge in Maria Butina Case Rips Prosecutors Who Claimed She Offered Sex to Get a Job

Even still, Butina remains held without bond.

A courtroom sketch depicts Maria Butina, a 29-year-old gun rights activist suspected of being a covert Russian agent, during a hearing at the federal courthouse in Washington, DC, on July 18, 2018. Dana Verkouteren/AP Photo

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

A judge rebuked federal prosecutors Monday for falsely alleging that Maria Butina, a Russian national accused of acting as an unregistered foreign agent, had offered sex in exchange for a job—but ruled to leave Butina in prison pending trial.

Prosecutors’ allegation, which they grudgingly retracted in a court filing Friday, “damaged [Butina’s] reputation” and “really makes it very difficult to have a fair trial,” US District Judge Tanya Chutkan said Monday at a hearing on Butina’s effort to secure bail.

Still, Chutkan ruled twice for the government at the hearing. She maintained a prior order that Butina be held without bond, saying defense lawyers had failed to show their client did not pose a flight risk. “I cannot envision any scenario where it is not possible…for Ms. Butina to walk out of jail, be put in a car with diplomatic tags, and taken to an airport,” Chutkan said. She also imposed a gag order on defense attorney Robert Driscoll, barring him from speaking to reporters.

Touting herself as the founder of a Russian gun rights group, Butina worked with Alexander Torshin, a top official at the Russian central bank, to gain access to top levels of the National Rifle Association and the Republican Party in 2015 and 2016. Prosecutors charged her on July 16 with acting as an unregistered agent for Russia. In a July 18 motion arguing she should be held without bond, they alleged that Butina’s relationship with a conservative political activist, identified elsewhere as Paul Erickson, was a cover used by Butina as part of an influence operation. Butina was not really interested in Erickson, the government argued, because she once “offered an individual other than [Erickson] sex in exchange for a position within a special interest organization.” Driscoll, Butina’s lawyer, has repeatedly denounced that allegation, noting prosecutors appeared to misread an exchange with an old friend in Russia in which Butina jokingly offered “sex” to repay a personal favor.

In a motion filed Friday, prosecutors said their reading may have been “mistaken,” but argued Butina nevertheless had no US ties that would prevent her from fleeing.

Chutkan said Monday she was “dismayed” by the prosecutors’ claim. “It took approximately five minutes for me to review those emails and tell that they were jokes,” the judge said. “It was apparent on their face.” The prosecutors representing the government on Monday, assistant US attorneys Thomas Saunders and Erik Kenerson, did not respond to Chutkan’s statements. (The case was brought by prosecutors working separately from special counsel Robert Mueller.)

Chutkan wasn’t just frustrated with government prosecutors at the hearing. She chastised Driscoll for submitting videos as evidence, after the court’s deadline, that intended to show that Butina and Erickson have a legitimate relationship, including a clip of the couple lip-syncing the song “Beauty and the Beast” together. “I am not sure what on the earth [the videos’] relevance is to Ms. Butina’s risk of flight,” Chutkan said.

She also knocked Driscoll for using sensationalized language in court filings. Phrases like “reeks of desperation” to describe government arguments seem aimed at an audience other than the court, the judge said. Chutkan further faulted Driscoll for violating a DC court rule barring lawyers from making statements about the merits of cases outside of court. “Counsel for defense is effectively trying the case in the media,” she said.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.