Why Did This GOP Candidate for Governor of Pennsylvania Tell a Bizarre Story About Raccoons?

It came from Infowars.

Christopher Millette/Erie Times-News via AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

An Infowars post from early 2016 was revived on the campaign trail in Pennsylvania last week and, well, things got weird. 

Republican candidate Scott Wagner, a former state senator, has not been shy about his affection for President Donald Trump as he aims to become governor in a state the president won. Like the president, Wagner began his career in private business—a trash collection firm rather than a real estate empire—and has paired a brash, “no apologies” style of campaigning with a populist appeal to Pennsylvanian workers. He also, naturally, has declined to release his tax returns

But expressions of admiration took a bizarre turn last week during a campaign stop in Wilkes-Barre, a city in the northeastern part of the state. In an attempt to explain Trump’s appeal to the voters who earned him the presidency, Wagner borrowed from an allegory originally published in Infowars, the far-right outlet run by conspiracy monger—and persona non grata on Facebook and Twitter—Alex Jones. 

Here’s a relevant portion of what Wagner said, as transcribed by PennLive, a Central Pennsylvania news site:

“You’ve been on vacation for weeks. You come home and your basement is infested with raccoons. Hundreds of rabid, messy, mean raccoons have overtaken your basement.

“You want them gone immediately. You call the city. You call four different exterminators, but nobody can handle the job. But there’s this one guy and he guarantees to get rid of them, so you hire him.

“I’m not referring to Donald Trump here, but I’m referring to the raccoon guy. You don’t care if the guy smells, you don’t care if the guy swears and you don’t care if he drinks a lot and you don’t care how many time he’s been married. You don’t care if he has a plumbers crack.

“You simply want the raccoons gone. You want the problem fixed, he’s the guy, he’s the best period. That’s the raccoon guy. Here’s why we want Trump. Yeah he’s got faults and I’m not going to read exactly what’s on here, but we really don’t care. This county is mess because politicians suck.

There’s a whole lot to unpack there. 

The original Infowars article, which was attributed to an anonymous “80 year old American,” goes further in making a direct comparison to immigrants and refugees. “This country is weak, bankrupt, our enemies are making fun of us, we are being invaded by illegal aliens and bringing tens of thousands of Muslim refugees to America, while leaving Christians behind to be persecuted,” the piece states.

Wagner’s story seems to traffic in some of the derogatory rhetoric Republicans have used to describe undocumented immigrants in the past—”rats and roaches” being a prominent example, along with Trump’s infamous description of Mexicans as “vermin” who carry crime and drugs. Wagner also appeared to imply that his own long-shot candidacy was comparable to the president’s—and an exterminator’s. “You want the problem fixed, he’s the guy, he’s the best period.”

His speech quickly became fodder for Pennsylvania Democrats, including Democratic Gov. Tom Wolf. “As Election Approaches, Scott Wagner Embarrasses Himself in New (and Old) Ways,” read the headline for one email sent by Wolf’s campaign in the days after the incident. 

In a statement, Wagner refused to apologize for his remarks and denied that the “raccoons” in question were a stand-in for any type of group or person.

“The story I read last week, to me, is an analogy that illustrates voters don’t really care what types of flaws their leaders have, as long as they are getting things done for the people they serve,” the statement read in part. “The raccoons do not represent any type of person—they represent the problems.” 

Wagner has trailed Wolf by more than 10 percentage points in every major poll taken since March, but he commands the support of major Republicans, including Vice President Mike Pence, ex-White House strategist Steve Bannon, and Trump, who endorsed Wagner at a rally in August.

“He’s going to be one hell of a governor,” Trump said. 

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

WHO DOESN’T LOVE A POSITIVE STORY—OR TWO?

“Great journalism really does make a difference in this world: it can even save kids.”

That’s what a civil rights lawyer wrote to Julia Lurie, the day after her major investigation into a psychiatric hospital chain that uses foster children as “cash cows” published, letting her know he was using her findings that same day in a hearing to keep a child out of one of the facilities we investigated.

That’s awesome. As is the fact that Julia, who spent a full year reporting this challenging story, promptly heard from a Senate committee that will use her work in their own investigation of Universal Health Services. There’s no doubt her revelations will continue to have a big impact in the months and years to come.

Like another story about Mother Jones’ real-world impact.

This one, a multiyear investigation, published in 2021, exposed conditions in sugar work camps in the Dominican Republic owned by Central Romana—the conglomerate behind brands like C&H and Domino, whose product ends up in our Hershey bars and other sweets. A year ago, the Biden administration banned sugar imports from Central Romana. And just recently, we learned of a previously undisclosed investigation from the Department of Homeland Security, looking into working conditions at Central Romana. How big of a deal is this?

“This could be the first time a corporation would be held criminally liable for forced labor in their own supply chains,” according to a retired special agent we talked to.

Wow.

And it is only because Mother Jones is funded primarily by donations from readers that we can mount ambitious, yearlong—or more—investigations like these two stories that are making waves.

About that: It’s unfathomably hard in the news business right now, and we came up about $28,000 short during our recent fall fundraising campaign. We simply have to make that up soon to avoid falling further behind than can be made up for, or needing to somehow trim $1 million from our budget, like happened last year.

If you can, please support the reporting you get from Mother Jones—that exists to make a difference, not a profit—with a donation of any amount today. We need more donations than normal to come in from this specific blurb to help close our funding gap before it gets any bigger.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate