October 30, 2018

This Republican Congressman Has Really Twisted Himself Into a Pretzel With This One

Kansas Rep. Kevin Yoder has voted with the president 92 percent of the time but says his Democratic opponent wouldn’t stand up to Trump, probably.

Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call/Newscom/ZUMA Press

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Kevin Yoder, a Republican congressman who is facing a tough reelection battle in Kansas’ 3rd Congressional District, is criticizing his Democratic opponent, Sharice Davids, for failing to stand up to President Donald Trump—even though Yoder himself consistently votes with Trump and carries the president’s endorsement. 

“What is it in her track record that tells us she would actually stand up to President Trump when she worked for him?” Yoder said in a story in the Kansas City Star last week. “She worked for the agenda. I just think it seems to be a pretty weak promise…when she already had a chance to do it and she didn’t.”

Yoder is referring to Davids’ participation in the prestigious, yearlong White House fellowship program. Although her fellowship began in August 2016, while former President Barack Obama was in office, it continued into the Trump administration. Davids dismissed the claim to the Star, and a University of Kansas political scientist pointed out in the article that the fellowship in question is essentially a “nonpartisan internship.”

Davids is an openly gay professional mixed-martial arts fighter who hopes to become the first Native American woman elected to Congress. She’s a Democrat who supports Medicaid expansion and gun control and has been critical of Yoder’s support for the president and of Trump himself. Yoder, on the other hand, has voted with Trump 92 percent of the time, according to FiveThirtyEight, and was first endorsed by the president in July after he included $5 billion for a border wall in the Department of Homeland Security budget bill in his capacity as chair of the Homeland Security appropriations subcommittee. 

Yoder preemptively defended himself, telling the Star that he protested the family separation policy in the DHS congressional committee. However, as McClatchy notes, Yoder ultimately voted for a hardline immigration bill, sponsored by Rep. Bob Goodlatte (R-Va.), later that week. 

In the candidates’ first and only debate before the midterms Tuesday, Yoder made a point of saying he’s willing to stand up to Trump when he disagrees with him. He then accused Davids of “rooting against” Trump—despite his earlier criticism that she wouldn’t stand up to him. Davids shot back by saying Yoder “votes with this president through thick and thin.” 

According to the most recent polling, Davids leads Yoder by 9 points. The Kansas district was the only one in the state to narrowly voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2016 presidential election.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate