New Study Shows the Huge Costs of the Republican War on Obamacare

This is what happens when states reject Medicaid expansion.

Alex Edelman/ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

A new report from the investigative arm of Congress shows just how much damage Republican politicians have done by blocking the implementation of a key part of Obamacare. The study, conducted by the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office, looked at the impact of Medicaid expansion—a core Obamacare component that offers health insurance to anyone who earns up to 138 percent of the federal poverty line. Republicans in 17 states have yet to implement Medicaid expansion, despite the fact that the federal government pays for 90 percent of the costs.

The GAO study examines how low-income adults—defined as those who would qualify for expansion—fare, and shows that the program has had a huge impact on access to health care. In states that accepted the Medicaid expansion, just 9 percent of low-income adults reported that they had financial trouble accessing necessary medical care. In states without expansion, 20 percent of people couldn’t afford the care they needed. In expansion states, 82 percent said they knew of a medical provider they could turn to when they needed care, whereas just 68 percent of low-income adults said the same in states without expansion.

There have been a host of studies that show how Medicaid expansion has benefitted people who live in the states that have adopted it. A report from the Commonwealth Fund earlier this year showed that expansion states had uninsured rates that were 10 percentage points lower on average than those of states that rejected expansion. Medicaid expansion has also led to people carrying less medical debt. One study suggested that people who buy insurance on the individual market pay lower premiums if they live in a state with expansion, because Medicaid tends to cover sicker people who would otherwise drive up the cost of private plans.

While Republican governors and state legislatures across the country have resisted implementing the program, voters in red states are fighting back. There are ballot initiatives this November in Utah, Nebraska, and Idaho that would force those states to adopt Medicaid expansion. As I explain in the current issue of Mother Jones

So far, the ACA has proved remarkably popular at the ballot box. Last year, Maine voters approved by an 18-point margin a measure to expand Medicaid, despite fierce opposition from Republican Gov. Paul LePage. Since then, LePage has bitterly resisted implementing the law, leading to a lengthy court battle. But the Fairness Project, a national group that backed the proposal, sees the campaign as a successful test run. “There’s clearly a trend whereby the legislatures refused to embrace the Medicaid expansion for whatever reasons,” says Jonathan Schleifer, the group’s executive director, “and their constituents want to see the benefits of [expansion].”

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.