After Pittsburgh Massacre, Trump Sticks to His Divisive Closing Pitch Ahead of Midterms

Anti-immigrant rhetoric, attacks on the media, self-centered tweets. All in one day.

Chris Kleponis/ZUMA

One day after visiting Pittsburgh, where thousands gathered to mourn the lives of the 11 people killed while worshipping at the Tree of Life synagogue on Saturday, President Donald Trump appeared primarily concerned with reports of his reception while downplaying the demonstrators who had protested his visit. “We were treated so warmly. Small protest was not seen by us, staged far away,” he claimed on Twitter before resuming his attacks on the media. 

The president also tweeted on Wednesday, without evidence, that Mexican officials had been violently attacked or were “unwilling” to stop the so-called “caravan” of migrants coming from Central America. Soon after, Trump shifted to promoting his supposed plans to prepare an executive order aimed at ending birthright citizenship

Together, the string of tweets on Wednesday made it clear that the president had no intention of dialing back his frequently baseless, anti-immigrant rhetoric. Nor did he care to hit pause on pummeling the media after attracting fierce condemnation last week for blaming the media for the country’s divisiveness in the wake of the spate of pipe bombs sent to prominent Democrats and the offices of CNN. This week, the Tree of Life massacre appears to serve as yet another opportunity to continue—not a cause to halt—his attacks on his perceived opponents. “The Fake News stories were just the opposite-Disgraceful!” he included at the end of his Pittsburgh tweet.

While Trump’s behavior no longer surprises—he had, after all, publicly bemoaned the potential effect the mailed bombs would have on Republicans in next week’s midterm elections—it has come to define his closing pitch to voters, one that reveals a desperate president willing to spew as much hate as it takes to bring it home. According to the latest polls, however, that approach looks like it may at least cost Republicans the House. 

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

Share your feedback: We’re planning to launch a new version of the comments section. Help us test it.