Trump Fails to Deny Tax Fraud Allegations in New York Times Investigation

Instead, he attacked the report as “very boring.”

Ting Shen/ZUMA

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

On Tuesday, the New York Times published a sweeping investigation into the source of President Donald Trump’s wealth that shattered his claims of being a self-made billionaire who had received little financial help from his family. Along with evidence of “outright fraud” by Trump, the massive expose found that a complex system of dubious tax-schemes helped the president reap at least $413 million from his real-estate mogul father.

Trump is notably not denying the report, either. Instead, in his first response to the damning piece, he appeared to take issue with the exact math behind the Times‘ numbers and the concept of inflation. Trump did not refute the investigation’s serious allegations that he participated in tax-dodging schemes to significantly increase his inheritance and that of his siblings.

He also dismissed it as a “very old, boring” story.

Trump’s reaction on Wednesday is a significant departure from the statement his lawyer provided to the Times that called the report “highly defamatory.” Similarly to the president, the White House on Tuesday also did not directly deny the report. Instead, it claimed that the IRS had approved such transactions. Press Secretary Sarah Huckabee Sanders went on to accuse the paper of ignoring the president’s economic successes for the sake of attacking him. 

Shortly after the piece was published, the New York State Department of Tax and Finance said that it was reviewing the allegations.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.