The Air Force Failed to Report a Troubled Veteran’s Fingerprints to the FBI. Then He Killed 26 People.

A blistering new report from the Pentagon’s internal watchdog faults the department’s system of reporting crimes.

A tarp is wrapped around the First Baptist Church of Sutherland Springs as law enforcement officials wrap up their investigation into the shooting there last year that left 26 people dead. Scott Olson/Getty Images

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A report made public this week by the Pentagon’s internal watchdog found that the Air Force neglected to prevent Devin Kelley, a veteran with a domestic violence conviction, from acquiring a firearm several times before he killed 26 people in a Texas church last November

In November 2012, Kelley pleaded guilty in a military court-marital to assaulting his wife and toddler stepson. He was given a sentence of no more than three years in confinement at an Air Force base in New Mexico. That conviction should have prevented Kelley from purchasing a variant of the AR-15, a military-style semi-automatic weapon, that he used in the shooting. But because the Air Force failed to submit his fingerprints to the FBI—as Defense Department policy requires—Kelley did not appear in a background-check database. After he was released, he was able to legally buy that weapon at a store in San Antonio, Texas, in addition to three other firearms from other licensed dealers.

“Because his fingerprints were not submitted to the FBI,” the report states, “Kelley was able to purchase firearms, which he used to kill 26 people.” 

Ann Stefanek, chief of Air Force media operations, said in a statement provided to Mother Jones that the Air Force was “committed to ensuring full compliance with criminal history reporting guidelines” and had launched several audits and internal probes into the matter. 

“Immediately following the tragedy at Sutherland Springs last year, the Air Force determined that the criminal record of former Airman who killed 26 people should have been reported to the FBI and wasn’t,” she said. Stefanek went on to say an Air Force review completed a month after the shooting identified 21 areas of improvement to the service’s criminal history reporting practices. Since that time, twenty of the 21 recommendations “have already been completed” and the remaining one will be completed in July.

In addition to Stefanek’s statement, the Air Force issued a six-page, single-spaced “corrective actions summary report” detailing the department’s response over the past year. Among the conclusions highlighted in this document was the systemic nature of reporting flaws across the military. “The failure in reporting Kelley’s criminal history was not an isolated event unique to this case or to Holloman Air Force Base where the investigation unfolded,” notes the document, which was unattributed. “Lack of compliance with reporting requirements across the Air Force and the other Services was highlighted in multiple Department of Defense Inspector General audits that took place prior to the tragic shooting in Texas.”

The inspector general’s office, which is independent from the Air Force and other branches of the military, launched an examination of the event days after the shooting by request of the Air Force’s top civilian and military officers. The resulting 131-page report was released publicly on Thursday. 

In response to the Air Force’s missteps, Congress introduced bipartisan legislation that penalizes government agencies for not reporting relevant criminal records to the national background check system that firearms dealers use to determine whether an individual can purchase a gun. President Trump signed that measure into law in March.

“Had existing law been enforced, the horrific tragedies in Sutherland Springs and Parkland would have never occurred,” said co-sponsor Rep. John Culberson (R-TX). “Fixing the background check system will ensure that guns stay out of the hands of people who have broken the law and already forfeited their right to own a gun.”

Read the full report here:

WE'LL BE BLUNT:

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT

We need to start raising significantly more in donations from our online community of readers, especially from those who read Mother Jones regularly but have never decided to pitch in because you figured others always will. We also need long-time and new donors, everyone, to keep showing up for us.

In "It's Not a Crisis. This Is the New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, how brutal it is to sustain quality journalism right now, what makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there, and why support from readers is the only thing that keeps us going. Despite the challenges, we're optimistic we can increase the share of online readers who decide to donate—starting with hitting an ambitious $300,000 goal in just three weeks to make sure we can finish our fiscal year break-even in the coming months.

Please learn more about how Mother Jones works and our 47-year history of doing nonprofit journalism that you don't find elsewhere—and help us do it with a donation if you can. We've already cut expenses and hitting our online goal is critical right now.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate