Trump Signals Full Steam Ahead on Syria Withdrawal, But Reporters Expose Mess Behind the Scenes

The president’s abrupt call for removing troops let loose a chaotic tug-of-war.

John Bolton, national security advisor, istens as U.S. President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting in the Cabinet Room of the White House.Al Drago/picture-alliance/dpa/AP

For indispensable reporting on the coronavirus crisis and more, subscribe to Mother Jones' newsletters.

On Sunday, President Donald Trump tweeted that the “long overdue pullout from Syria” was underway. Less than a month ago, the president abruptly announced the troop withdrawal, a move that defied advice from close advisers and has fueled concern from allies over the region’s future instability.

An investigation by the Washington Post published on Sunday sheds light on the behind-the-scenes chaos that followed Trump’s abrupt decision. Since the president’s announcement in December, “a tug-of-war with allies and his advisers has roiled the national security apparatus over how, and whether, to execute a pullout,” the Post reported. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and National Security Advisor John Bolton sought to assuage allies’ concerns. At the same time, foreign leaders like France’s president Emmanual Marcon and Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu hoped to persuade Trump to alter his plans for a swift withdrawal. 

At one point, Bolton stated during an overseas trip to Israel and Turkey that US forces would stay in Syria until “Washington is assured that Kurdish allies are safe,” the Post reported. But another condition reportedly angered Turkey’s president Recep Tayyip Erdogan: “a guarantee that Turkey would not harm ‘the Kurds,'” which reportedly “upended negotiations” between US coalition envoy James Jeffrey and Turkish officials, the paper reported.” 

“They screwed this whole thing up, and it didn’t have to be this way. It could have been a defensible decision, done thoughtfully,” one Trump adviser told the Washington Post after Bolton’s trip to Turkey. Bolton did not respond to the Post‘s request for comment on the matter. 

Just a day after Trump announced his intentions to withdraw troops in December, Trump’s defense secretary James Mattis resigned after he reportedly clashed with the president about the decision to withdraw. Late last week, US military officials overseeing the US-led coalition against ISIS announced that it had “began the process of our deliberate withdrawal from Syria.”

But adding to the confusion, reported The New York Times, Bolton stated that the withdrawal could be conditional, meaning that the operation could take months, even years, to finish. The Times on Friday reported that the military had started pulling equipment out of Syria but had not started withdrawing the roughly 2,000 troops stationed there.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

Thank you!

We didn't know what to expect when we told you we needed to raise $400,000 before our fiscal year closed on June 30, and we're thrilled to report that our incredible community of readers contributed some $415,000 to help us keep charging as hard as we can during this crazy year.

You just sent an incredible message: that quality journalism doesn't have to answer to advertisers, billionaires, or hedge funds; that newsrooms can eke out an existence thanks primarily to the generosity of its readers. That's so powerful. Especially during what's been called a "media extinction event" when those looking to make a profit from the news pull back, the Mother Jones community steps in.

The months and years ahead won't be easy. Far from it. But there's no one we'd rather face the big challenges with than you, our committed and passionate readers, and our team of fearless reporters who show up every day.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate

We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.