Democrat Adam Schiff Just Laid Out Why Trump’s National Emergency Is Unconstitutional

“If we surrender the power of the purse…there will be little check and no balance left.”

House Intelligence Committee members Rep. Terry Sewell (D-AL), Rep. Adam Schiff (D_CA) and Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-CA) join House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) for a news conference July 17, 2018.Chip Somodevilla/Getty

President Donald Trump’s decision to declare a national emergency in an attempt to gin up funding for his wall on the United States’ Southern border with Mexico is plainly unconstitutional, Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) told CNN on Sunday morning.

“This is the first time a president has declared an emergency when Congress has explicitly rejected funding for a particular project that the president is advocating,” Schiff said. Trump declared a national emergency over border wall funding on February 14 after failing to come to an agreement with Congress and threatening to shut down the federal government (again). Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell eventually came around to supporting the idea of declaring a national emergency after initially expressing concerns about the precedent it might set for presidential power moving forward.

Unlike McConnell, Democrats are holding firm to their belief that Trump is crossing a delicate constitutional line in bypassing Congress and diverting millions of dollars in federal money to a deeply partisan project. “If we surrender the power of the purse, which is our most important power, there will be little check and no balance left,” Schiff said Sunday.

The next step in this saga will be a challenge in the courts, which is already underway. The American Civil Liberties Union announced that it will sue Trump over the move. “By the president’s very own admission in the Rose Garden, there is no national emergency,” ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “He just grew impatient and frustrated with Congress, and decided to move along his promise for a border wall ‘faster.’”

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi also signaled that democrats will file their own legal challenge over the move. “It’s not an emergency, what’s happening at the border,” Pelosi said. “It’s a humanitarian challenge to us.”

DOES IT FEEL LIKE POLITICS IS AT A BREAKING POINT?

Headshot of Editor in Chief of Mother Jones, Clara Jeffery

It sure feels that way to me, and here at Mother Jones, we’ve been thinking a lot about what journalism needs to do differently, and how we can have the biggest impact.

We kept coming back to one word: corruption. Democracy and the rule of law being undermined by those with wealth and power for their own gain. So we're launching an ambitious Mother Jones Corruption Project to do deep, time-intensive reporting on systemic corruption, and asking the MoJo community to help crowdfund it.

We aim to hire, build a team, and give them the time and space needed to understand how we got here and how we might get out. We want to dig into the forces and decisions that have allowed massive conflicts of interest, influence peddling, and win-at-all-costs politics to flourish.

It's unlike anything we've done, and we have seed funding to get started, but we're looking to raise $500,000 from readers by July when we'll be making key budgeting decisions—and the more resources we have by then, the deeper we can dig. If our plan sounds good to you, please help kickstart it with a tax-deductible donation today.

Thanks for reading—whether or not you can pitch in today, or ever, I'm glad you're with us.

Signed by Clara Jeffery

Clara Jeffery, Editor-in-Chief

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate