Elizabeth Warren Announces Plan to Reject Big Donors

The 2020 candidate said that she won’t be holding private fundraisers.

Larry Burton

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) has decided to up the ante with her latest campaign finance pledge: No more fancy fundraising dinners, donor calls, or wooing wealthy donors.

The 2020 Democratic candidate announced on Monday that her campaign “will be run on the principle of equal access for anybody who joins it,” because political candidates “spend way too much time with wealthy donors.” Warren acknowledged that this new approach would definitely come at a cost, almost guaranteed to ensure that she will be out-raised by other candidates in the presidential race but that she said it was “the right thing to do.”

Warren’s announcement comes at a time when she is already facing fundraising struggles. Last week, after Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) raised a record $6 million from small donors within the first 24 hours of his announcement, Warren sent her supporters multiple emails warning them of low fundraising totals, according to the New York Times.

The former Harvard law professor said she would no longer hold private fundraising events or meet one-on-one with big donors as most prominent Democratic and Republican candidates have in the past. “That means no fancy receptions or big money fund-raisers only with people who can write the big checks,” Warren said in her announcement. “It means that wealthy donors won’t be able to purchase better seats or one-on-one time with me at our events. And it means I won’t be doing ‘call time,’ which is when candidates take hours to call wealthy donors to ask for their support.”

Although she did hold fundraisers during her past campaigns for US Senate, Warren hasn’t held any since she launched her presidential exploratory bid at the end of last year, according to POLITICO.

It’s yet to be seen whether this will create a new benchmark for campaign finance within the Democratic primary like the ripple effects of Warren’s January challenge not to take money from super PACs did. Most of the other major Democratic candidates in the 2020 primary—including Kamala Harris (D-Calif.), Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.), and Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.)—have all pledged not to take corporate PAC money, while Warren has also said she would not to take money from any PAC and from lobbyists.

Warren argued in her latest announcement that the traditional form of fundraising, which is dependent on a few wealthy donors, creates a system of buying access to politicians and “closes out women and communities of color.”

Warren claimed that some Democrats are “so deeply afraid of losing to Donald Trump that they don’t want to risk saying or doing anything different at all,” because challenging the status quo within fundraising could hurt their electoral chances.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate