February 23, 2019

The Internet Can’t Stop Laughing About the Way This Senator Talked to Some Children

Sen. Dianne Feinstein wasn’t about to take any guff from Sunrise Movement activists too young to vote.

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) at the Capitol on Tuesday, February 12, 2019.Tom Williams/CQ Roll Call via AP

The internet lost its mind on Friday evening when the Sunrise Movement, a climate activism group composed of youthful volunteers working to gain support for the Green New Deal, shared a video of school-age activists visiting Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-Calif.) San Francisco office to ask her to support the resolution. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell (R-Ky.) has promised to hold a vote on the Green New Deal, which aims to transition the US to 100 percent renewable energy by 2030, as early as next week, a vote that is expected to divide centrists Democrats from their progressive colleagues who back the proposal.

The six-term senator who recently won reelection has her reasons for being skeptical about the Green New Deal—mainly, according to the exchange, the funding required for the plan and the ambitious 10-year timeline proposed for the transition. But her reactions to the earnest young constituents who presented her with a letter about the subject ranged from dismissive to derisive, and the encounter went viral.

One reason was Feinstein’s argument that the activists were naive and she’s not. “I’ve been doing this for 30 years,” she tells the group. “I know what I’m doing.” And just to show how much more experienced she was, she used political jargon to explain that the margin of her reelection win meant she could navigate climate policy better than they ever could. The New York Times’ Maggie Haberman couldn’t quite wrap her head around that logic:

It got worse when the activists tried to explain they are her constituents, and therefore she has to listen to them. Apparently, that all depends on how one defines “constituents.” When she learns the activists aren’t old enough to vote, she says, “Well, you didn’t vote for me.” The exchange apparently left CNN’s Rebecca Buck in tears.

Feinstein asserted that she has an alternative “responsible resolution” that would be a more effective means of combating climate change than the Green New Deal. When a protester suggested that any resolution that doesn’t take “bold, transformative action is not going to be what we need,” Feinstein shot back. “Well, you know better than I do,” she said, “so I think one day you should run for Senate, then you should do it your way.” There was a slight problem with that logic, as Varshini Prakash, the co-founder and executive director of the Sunrise Movement, noted:

Proponents of the Green New Deal and climate allies expressed outrage over Feinstein’s reaction. Longtime climate activist and 350.org founder Bill McKibben said Feinstein proved the point that Rep. Ocasio Cortez and the youth-led Sunrise Movement has been trying to make: Younger generations have to fight for climate change because the the older generations won’t.

The widely-circulated two-minute video had been edited down from a livestream the Sunrise Movement did from the office, something Feinstein defenders were quick to note. In the full 15-minute video, Feinstein does offer a tentative “yes” vote on the Green New Deal, engages the activists in a conversation about substantive climate policy and, at one point, offers one of them an internship with her office. But the tone of Feinstein’s remarks still came through in the full exchange, something New York writer Rebecca Traister noted in her defense of the internet’s outrage:

Not everyone slammed her. Right-wing commentators Ben Shapiro, Erick Erickson, and Curt Schilling set aside their party affiliations to celebrate Feinstein’s rejection of the resolution. 

But that wasn’t the end of Feinstein’s climate politics woes on Friday. Later that evening, Oil Change US, a climate advocacy group that encourages politicians to reject campaign donations from fossil fuel companies, revealed that Feinstein had broken the “No Fossil Fuel” pledge she took during her 2018 reelection campaign. According to FEC filings, Feinstein had received $12,500 from oil companies last cycle.

More Mother Jones reporting on Climate Desk

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

AN IMPORTANT UPDATE

We’re falling behind our online fundraising goals and we can’t sustain coming up short on donations month after month. Perhaps you’ve heard? It is impossibly hard in the news business right now, with layoffs intensifying and fancy new startups and funding going kaput.

The crisis facing journalism and democracy isn’t going away anytime soon. And neither is Mother Jones, our readers, or our unique way of doing in-depth reporting that exists to bring about change.

Which is exactly why, despite the challenges we face, we just took a big gulp and joined forces with the Center for Investigative Reporting, a team of ace journalists who create the amazing podcast and public radio show Reveal.

If you can part with even just a few bucks, please help us pick up the pace of donations. We simply can’t afford to keep falling behind on our fundraising targets month after month.

Editor-in-Chief Clara Jeffery said it well to our team recently, and that team 100 percent includes readers like you who make it all possible: “This is a year to prove that we can pull off this merger, grow our audiences and impact, attract more funding and keep growing. More broadly, it’s a year when the very future of both journalism and democracy is on the line. We have to go for every important story, every reader/listener/viewer, and leave it all on the field. I’m very proud of all the hard work that’s gotten us to this moment, and confident that we can meet it.”

Let’s do this. If you can right now, please support Mother Jones and investigative journalism with an urgently needed donation today.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate