Trump Denies Report That Deutsche Bank Ignored Suspicious Transactions: “I Don’t Need Banks”

The president has amassed more personal debt than any other in US history.

Olivier Douliery/ZUMA

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

The morning after the New York Times reported that Deutsche Bank repeatedly dismissed concerns of suspicious activity, including potential money-laundering attempts by President Donald Trump and his son-in-law Jared Kushner in 2016 and 2017, Trump did his best to reject the latest investigation into his longstanding, fraught ties with the German bank.

“The Failing New York Times (it will pass away when I leave office in 6 years), and others of the Fake News Media, keep writing phony stories about how I didn’t use many banks because they didn’t want to do business with me. Wrong!” Trump began on Twitter.

He went on to falsely claim that he had never sought loans from other banks, despite his personal financial disclosures showing he has done exactly that, while continuing to amass more debt than any other president in US history. Trump then appeared to confirm one aspect of the Times‘ reporting, that he and Kushner often engaged in all-cash deals, some of which involved foreign entities. Trump asserted that this was evidence that he “doesn’t need banks.”

“No, I built a great business and don’t need banks, but if I did they would be there,” he tweeted.

In the scramble to defend the relationship with Deutsche Bank, Trump on Monday evidently left out some information, an error he blamed on Twitter. “Two Tweets missing from last batch, probably a Twitter error,” the president remarked. “No time for a redo! Only the Dems get redos!”

That apparent joke has since been deleted.

Last month, Trump and his family sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One in an effort to block Democrats from investigating their personal finances.

DECEMBER IS MAKE OR BREAK

A full one-third of our annual fundraising comes in this month alone. That’s risky, because a strong December means our newsroom is on the beat and reporting at full strength—but a weak one means budget cuts and hard choices ahead.

The December 31 deadline is closing in fast. To reach our $400,000 goal, we need readers who’ve never given before to join the ranks of MoJo donors. And we need our steadfast supporters to give again—any amount today.

Managing an independent, nonprofit newsroom is staggeringly hard. There’s no cushion in our budget—no backup revenue, no corporate safety net. We can’t afford to fall short, and we can’t rely on corporations or deep-pocketed interests to fund the fierce, investigative journalism Mother Jones exists to do.

That’s why we need you right now. Please chip in to help close the gap.

DECEMBER IS MAKE OR BREAK

A full one-third of our annual fundraising comes in this month alone. That’s risky, because a strong December means our newsroom is on the beat and reporting at full strength—but a weak one means budget cuts and hard choices ahead.

The December 31 deadline is closing in fast. To reach our $400,000 goal, we need readers who’ve never given before to join the ranks of MoJo donors. And we need our steadfast supporters to give again—any amount today.

Managing an independent, nonprofit newsroom is staggeringly hard. There’s no cushion in our budget—no backup revenue, no corporate safety net. We can’t afford to fall short, and we can’t rely on corporations or deep-pocketed interests to fund the fierce, investigative journalism Mother Jones exists to do.

That’s why we need you right now. Please chip in to help close the gap.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate