We Just Got a Ton of Clarity on Where the Democrats Stand on Medicare for All

Elizabeth Warren was the main advocate at the first Democratic debate.

Ten Democratic presidential candidates respond to a question about health care during the first 2020 Democratic debate in Miami, Fla., on June 25, 2019.MSNBC

Twenty minutes into the first night of the first 2020 Democratic debate, NBC Nightly News anchor Lester Holt asked a straightforwards yes or no question of the field: “Who here would abolish their private health insurance in favor of a government run plan?”

Elizabeth Warren’s hand shot up immediately from the center of the stage. It was a hand many progressives had been waiting to see. The Massachusetts senator has defined her run for the White House with a bevy of detailed plans, but her stance on health care had been a bit more elusive. “There are a lot of different ways to get there,” she told the New York Times without specifically naming the single-payer plan pushed by her 2020 rival, Sen. Bernie Sanders. “‘Medicare for All’ has a lot of different paths.”

But she couldn’t have been clearer when she explained her answer from the debate stage on Wednesday night. “I’m with Bernie on Medicare for All,” she said. She added that the profit-driven private health care industry had left families with “rising premiums, rising copays, and fighting with insurance companies.”

“Medicare for All solves that problem,” she explained from the stage.

But Warren and New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio—the only other candidate to raise his hand in response to Holt’s question—were in the minority. Most of the rest of the candidates appeared to coalesce around Medicare for America instead, a universal health care plan authored by Reps. Rosa DeLauro (D-Conn.) and Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.). It would offer a comprehensive federal insurance option to uninsured Americans, while allowing those who have employer-provided insurance to keep it if they choose. Former Texas Rep. Beto O’Rourke voiced support for it, noting that it would allow anyone who needs insurance to easily obtain it. “But if you’re a member of a union, and you negotiated for a health care plan that you like because it works for you and your family, you’re able to keep it,” O’Rourke said.

New Jersey sen. Cory Booker expressed support for a pathway like it, as well, as a first step to move toward Medicare for All. Washington Gov. Jay Inslee and Minnesota Sen. Amy Klobuchar, meanwhile, voiced their support for a “public option.”

Notably, neither Ohio Rep. Tim Ryan nor Hawaii Rep. Tulsi Gabbard—both of whom have cosponsored the House’s single-payer plan—raised their hands in response to Holt’s question. Gabbard, however, affirmed her support. “What we should be talking about is our objective: making sure every single American is able to get the healthcare that they need,” she said “I believe Medicare for All is the way to do that.”

The candidates’ substantive answers on health care offered much needed clarification on where they stood. As I wrote earlier this month, several candidates who serve in the House and Senate have signed their names to their respective chamber’s single-payer bills, but have been less clear as to what sort of health care policy they would enact as president. All candidates who spoke about health care, however, were unified in their belief that universal health care is a necessary step.


In 2014, before Donald Trump announced his run for president, we knew we had to do something different to address the fundamental challenge facing journalism: how hard-hitting reporting that can hold the powerful accountable can survive as the bottom falls out of the news business.

Being a nonprofit, we started planning The Moment for Mother Jones: A special campaign to raise $25 million for key investments to make Mother Jones the strongest watchdog it can be. Five years later, readers have stepped up and contributed an astonishing $23 million in gifts and future pledges. This is an incredible statement from the Mother Jones community in the face of the huge threats—both economic and political—against the free press.

Read more about The Moment and see what we've been able to accomplish thanks to readers' incredible generosity so far, and please join them today. Your gift will be matched dollar for dollar, up to $500,000 total, during this critical moment for journalism.

We Recommend


Sign up for our newsletters

Subscribe and we'll send Mother Jones straight to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.


Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.


We have a new comment system! We are now using Coral, from Vox Media, for comments on all new articles. We'd love your feedback.