A Fight Over Abortion Is Tearing Apart the Democratic Party of a Deep-Blue State

The Rhode Island party leadership stripped its women’s caucus of privileges after it backed an abortion rights bill.

Abortion-rights supporters protest a fundraiser for the Rhode Island Senate Democrats political action committee on May, 23rd. Jennifer McDermott/AP Photo

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

As red states across the country have moved to limit access to reproductive health care, the Democratic Party in one of the bluest states in the country is coming apart over abortion rights. 

Earlier this month, the Rhode Island Democratic State Committee voted to strip the Rhode Island Democratic Party Women’s Caucus of key privileges, apparently as retribution for the caucus’ push to enshrine the right to an abortion in state law. The move was the culmination of a bitter fight between the anti-abortion members of the party’s leadership and legislators seeking to expand reproductive rights.

The Women’s Caucus can no longer endorse candidates, spend money, or put out public statements without the committee’s approval. According to Liz Gledhill, the chair of the caucus, the state committee’s decision is payback for a series of intra-party fights over reproductive rights, sexual harassment, and Democratic Party values. 

In June, Rhode Island passed the Reproductive Privacy Act, which affirmatively legalizes abortion in the state so that if the Supreme Court were to overturn Roe v. Wade, Rhode Island would maintain the right to an abortion. Although Democrats control both legislative chambers, State Sen. Gayle Goldin says passing the bill was an uphill battle due to fierce resistance from anti-abortion Democrats. 

Rhode Island, which is the most Catholic state in the country, has long been home to anti-abortion Democrats. In the 2016 election, Rhode Island Right to Life, an anti-abortion advocacy group, endorsed 48 Democrats running for office in the state legislature, including the two top  Democrats in the state House and the top three in the Senate. Democratic House Speaker Nicholas Mattiello called efforts to codify Roe v. Wade “divisive” and “irrelevant” in a public radio interview in 2018 and voted against the Reproductive Privacy Act. The legislation passed by a 21-17 vote in the state Senate and 45-29 in the House. 

The Democratic infighting began in 2017, when Joe DeLorenzo, a former state representative and then a vice chair of the state Democratic Party, openly mocked Democratic state Rep. Teresa Tanzi’s allegations of sexual harassment by other state legislators, who she claims told her to offer sexual favors in exchange for getting her bills passed. “Everything is sexual harassment today,” DeLorenzo said on WADK Newport. “If a woman walks into my office and I say to her, ‘Boy, you look really nice in that dress’—sexual harassment. A woman walks in that I know—and we do this all the time, John—put your arm around her, giver her a kiss on the cheek—sexual harassment, sexual harassment.”  

Following the interview, there were immediate calls for his resignation. However, Mattiello refused to call for DeLorenzo’s ousting, igniting tensions on both sides. DeLorenzo ultimately left his post after the Women’s Caucus organized against him and the state Senate president called for him to step down. 

The party also struggled when it came to picking candidates to endorse. In 2018, the state party endorsed former Republican Michael Earnheart, who supported Donald Trump in 2016, for a state house race over the incumbent, Rep. Moira Walsh. Gledhill says the endorsement caused a major fissure between the Women’s Caucus and the state party, to the point where several members called for the resignation of party chairman Joseph McNamara. The party later pulled its endorsement of Earnheart. 

The choice to handicap the Women’s Caucus came as a shock to Gledhill. But she says her caucus didn’t take the decision lying down. After a caucus meeting, it chose to form a new organization called the Rhode Island Democratic Women’s Caucus, which can create its own bylaws and organize separately from the larger state party. The Women’s Caucus has also maintained an organization within the state Democratic Party. Gledhill says she has remained open to the possibility of working with the state party to come back together, but only if they can “have a seat at the table.” Gledhill isn’t holding out much hope of that happening anytime soon.

“I think they underestimated us,” says Gledhill. Since leaving the state party two weeks ago, she says, her caucus has raised thousands of dollars. Gledhill says the support has been overwhelming and that progressives in the state now feel they have an organization worth supporting.

“The difference between our party and the leadership in our caucus is that we don’t hesitate to say when something’s wrong, and we don’t care about losing a relationship with somebody that is promoting hatred,” says Gledhill. “It’s not tolerated, it’s not appropriate, and it’s not a part of our Democratic ideals.”

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate