A Federal Court Just Found a Key Part of Obamacare Unconstitutional

But the rest of the case was remanded to district court, leaving the bulk of the ACA safe for now.

Sachelle Babbar/Zuma

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

A federal appeals court just dealt a major blow to Obamacare.

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals determined that the individual mandate—a key part of the Affordable Care Act requiring uninsured Americans to pay a yearly penalty—was unconstitutional since it could no longer be considered a tax after the GOP tax bill from 2017 set the penalty for failing to obtain insurance at $0. In 2012, the Supreme Court upheld the ACA on the grounds that the individual mandate was a tax.

Still, the central question of Texas v. United States—whether the lack of an individual mandate invalidates the rest of the ACA—remains unanswered. The case has been sent back down to a district court to decide which parts of the law can stand and which must be jettisoned. That could spell serious trouble for many popular provisions of the law—including the ban on charging higher rates and denying coverage based on preexisting conditions—since that lower court previously struck down the entire ACA after ruling against the mandate.

The case was initially filed by a group of Republican state attorneys general, but the Trump administration later signed on to argue that all of Obamacare should be struck down. The Fifth Circuit’s decision to remand the case back to district court might offer political cover to Trump, though, since it is now unlikely that the case would reach the Supreme Court before the next election.

For now, the ruling has no actual effects on the law outside the mandate. The ACA remains in effect, and people who signed up for insurance during the 2020 open enrollment period will still be covered.

Read the entire decision here.

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

WE CAME UP SHORT.

We just wrapped up a shorter-than-normal, urgent-as-ever fundraising drive and we came up about $45,000 short of our $300,000 goal.

That means we're going to have upwards of $350,000, maybe more, to raise in online donations between now and June 30, when our fiscal year ends and we have to get to break-even. And even though there's zero cushion to miss the mark, we won't be all that in your face about our fundraising again until June.

So we urgently need this specific ask, what you're reading right now, to start bringing in more donations than it ever has. The reality, for these next few months and next few years, is that we have to start finding ways to grow our online supporter base in a big way—and we're optimistic we can keep making real headway by being real with you about this.

Because the bottom line: Corporations and powerful people with deep pockets will never sustain the type of journalism Mother Jones exists to do. The only investors who won’t let independent, investigative journalism down are the people who actually care about its future—you.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. We really need to see if we'll be able to raise more with this real estate on a daily basis than we have been, so we're hoping to see a promising start.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate