A Virginia Judge Just Stymied Gov. Glenn Youngkin’s Anti-Mask Efforts

On the issue of Covid mandates, the score stands at School Boards 1, Youngkin 0.

Gov. Glenn YoungkinSteven Helber/AP

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.

The score stands at Virginia Schools 1, Gov. Glenn Youngkin 0, after a judge ruled on Friday that school boards may disregard—for now—Youngkin’s attempt to ban student mask mandates. 

Virginia Circuit Court Judge Louise DiMatteo granted seven school boards temporary restraining orders against Youngkin’s directive. On his first day in office, the governor had signed an executive order stating that, as of January 24, schools were no longer allowed to make students wear masks on campus. 

On the day the order was to take effect, school boards in Alexandria, Falls Church, Hampton, and Richmond teamed up with their counterparts in Arlington, Fairfax, and Prince William counties to challenge it. Together, the seven boards represent more than 350,000 students from across the state. 

The school authorities argued that Youngkin overstepped his legal authority, and questioned whether an executive order can trump the decision of local school officials. DiMatteo agreed that the question merits further consideration. “I’m not here to decide who is right and wrong on masking. This case is a question of who has authority,” she said.  

“The order allows schools to continue to protect the health and well-being of all students and staff. While the legal process on this matter continues, today’s ruling preserves the existing policies and practices in Virginia school divisions, which includes masking requirements,” the school boards announced in a joint statement

Both sides believe an appeal is likely, according to reports from NBC 4. But, the legal fun doesn’t stop there. Youngkin still has at least three other legal battles in play, all of which pertain to the very same order.

WE'RE TAKING A SHORT BREAK…

from the big banner at the top of our pages asking for the donations that make Mother Jones' nonprofit journalism possible. But we still have upwards of $300,000 to raise by June 30, whether we get there is going to come down to the wire, and we can't afford to come up short.

If you value the reporting you get from Mother Jones and you can right now, please join your fellow readers who pitch in from time to time to keep our democracy-advancing, justice-seeking journalism charging hard (and to help us avoid a real budget crunch as June 30 approaches and our fiscal year ends).

payment methods

WE'RE TAKING A SHORT BREAK…

from the big banner at the top of our pages asking for the donations that make Mother Jones' nonprofit journalism possible. But we still have upwards of $300,000 to raise by June 30, whether we get there is going to come down to the wire, and we can't afford to come up short.

If you value the reporting you get from Mother Jones and you can right now, please join your fellow readers who pitch in from time to time to keep our democracy-advancing, justice-seeking journalism charging hard (and to help us avoid a real budget crunch as June 30 approaches and our fiscal year ends).

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate