Federal Judge Says Trump Likely Committed Felonies

“The Court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6.”

Donald Trump speaking on the Ellipse on January 6, 2021. Shawn Thew/CNP via Zuma

Facts matter: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter. Support our nonprofit reporting. Subscribe to our print magazine.

Former President Donald Trump probably broke the law by encouraging supporters to help him hang onto power after his defeat in the 2020 election, a federal judge wrote in an opinion released Monday.

“Based on the evidence, the Court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021,” US District Court Judge David Carter said in the ruling.

Carter also found that both Trump and John Eastman—an attorney who provided Trump with a bogus legal theory that Vice President Mike Pence could help overturn the election results by refusing to certify electoral votes—“more likely than not dishonestly conspired to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021.”

Carter’s findings came in a ruling ordering Eastman to turn over emails to a House committee investigating the January 6 attack on Congress. Eastman had sued to block enforcement of a congressional subpoena for those documents. Carter found that there was enough evidence that the emails related to crimes to allow enforcement of the subpoena. But the judge’s language went much further.

Eastman and Trump “launched a campaign to overturn a democratic election, an action unprecedented in American history,” Carter wrote. “Their campaign was not confined to the ivory tower—it was a coup in search of a legal theory.”

The judge continued: “If Dr. Eastman and President Trump’s plan had worked, it would have permanently ended the peaceful transition of power, undermining American democracy and the Constitution. If the country does not commit to investigating and pursuing accountability for those responsible, the Court fears January 6 will repeat itself.”

Carter’s ruling has no direct legal bearing on whether the Justice Department will pursue criminal charges against Trump. But it looks likely to increase political pressure on the Biden administration to prosecute the former president over his efforts to seize power.

WE'RE TAKING A SHORT BREAK…

from the big banner at the top of our pages asking for the donations that make Mother Jones' nonprofit journalism possible. But we still have upwards of $300,000 to raise by June 30, whether we get there is going to come down to the wire, and we can't afford to come up short.

If you value the reporting you get from Mother Jones and you can right now, please join your fellow readers who pitch in from time to time to keep our democracy-advancing, justice-seeking journalism charging hard (and to help us avoid a real budget crunch as June 30 approaches and our fiscal year ends).

payment methods

WE'RE TAKING A SHORT BREAK…

from the big banner at the top of our pages asking for the donations that make Mother Jones' nonprofit journalism possible. But we still have upwards of $300,000 to raise by June 30, whether we get there is going to come down to the wire, and we can't afford to come up short.

If you value the reporting you get from Mother Jones and you can right now, please join your fellow readers who pitch in from time to time to keep our democracy-advancing, justice-seeking journalism charging hard (and to help us avoid a real budget crunch as June 30 approaches and our fiscal year ends).

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate