Trump Confused His Ex-Wife With the Rape Accuser He Called “Not My Type”

A newly unsealed deposition undermines the former president’s go-to defense against E. Jean Carroll’s rape allegation.

Donald Trump with Marla Maples—not E. Jean Carroll.Kathy Willens/AP

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

Former President Donald Trump has given many denials to writer E. Jean Carroll’s allegation that he cornered her and raped her in a Bergdorf Goodman dressing room in the mid-1990s. He’s called Carroll’s story “all fiction,” “a con job,” and “a big fat hoax.”

“I know nothing about this woman,” Trump insisted in 2019, when Carroll first made her allegation public in a New York magazine article. “She’s a liar and a sick person,” he repeated recently. “She made it up probably to sell a book or for her own ego.”

Yet perhaps the most quoted of all Trump’s defenses is his insulting insistence that Carroll is “not my type,” as he told the Hill in an Oval Office interview shortly after Carroll’s story went public. The New York Times, USA Today, and many other outlets promptly ran his insult in their headlines. The Atlantic broke down the quote’s inherent misogyny: how it reduces an “unruly woman” to a sexual commodity, then dismisses her. Carroll, meanwhile, filed a defamation lawsuit over Trump’s denials, including the “not my type” quote, saying the president smeared her when he called her a liar. 

But a newly unsealed deposition from that lawsuit has thrown Trump’s “not my type” defense into question. According to the deposition transcript, when Trump was shown a picture of himself with his then-wife, Ivana Trump, talking to Carroll, Trump misidentified Carroll as his second wife, Marla Maples. 

“It’s Marla,” Trump responded when Carroll’s lawyer Roberta Kaplan presented the photo, as he pointed to Carroll.

“You’re saying Marla is in this photo?” Kaplan asked.

“That’s Marla, yeah. That’s my wife,” Trump responded.

“Which woman are you pointing to?” 

Trump’s lawyer, Alina Habba, broke in. “No, that’s Carroll.”

“Oh, I see,” Trump said.

“The person you just pointed to was E. Jean Carroll,” Kaplan added.

The confusion continued for a few more beats.

“That’s Carroll?” Trump asked

“That’s Carroll,” 

Earlier in the deposition, Trump said that the photo, which first came to attention in 2019 after Trump denied knowing Carroll, appeared to have been taken while greeting guests at the “receiving line” of a charity event.

We already knew that the “not my type” line is something of a knee-jerk reaction for Trump, particularly when women pose a threat to him. The former president has deployed the defense before, responding to former People magazine journalist Natasha Stoynoff’s allegations that he pushed her against the wall at Mar-a-Lago in 2005 and forced “his tongue down my throat.” (“Take a look. You take a look. Look at her. Look at her words. You tell me what you think. I don’t think so,” Trump responded.) Same with Jessica Leeds, who says he groped her on an airplane in the 1980s. (“Believe me, she would not be my first choice, that I can tell you. You don’t know. That would not be my first choice,” Trump said.) 

But now it appears that we can add the “not my type” defense, at least when it comes to Carroll, to the tally of Trump’s 30,573 “false or misleading claims” made over his four years in office.

The deposition is expected to come up in the Carroll v. Trump trial, which is scheduled to begin in April.

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

Owned by no one—except you.

We just keep seeing it happen: Newsrooms owned by billionaires and corporations are spinning their own narratives, overwriting the truth, following only stories that keep them in the pocket of those with even more power.

Not here. We’re not owned by anyone. We’re not part of any cult that demands our allegiance to a bottom line. We’ve spoken up and spoken out while other newsrooms changed their stories—or cut them altogether—to keep the C suite happy.

Our mission is to find the truth and amplify it. That’s why we’re independent, nonprofit, and, crucially, funded by readers. The investigations on our website will always be free to read, watch, and listen to, but our newsroom is powered by readers who pitch in what they can so we can keep asking the hard questions.

Can you chip in today?

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate