CNN: Supreme Court Justices Routinely Used Personal Email for “Sensitive Transmissions”

Personal emails. Burn bags left unattended. Printing from anywhere. New reporting from CNN raises new questions about security at the highest court in the land.

Andrew Harnik/AP

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

One time, I accidentally put a personal medical appointment on the public work calendar. Years ago, I tweeted something (very innocuous) from a brand account, intended for my own followers. The modern workplace requires vigilance (and numerous browsers and devices) to demarcate the strictly professional from the private. For you and me, co-mingling can feel inevitable, and a quick response can usually mop up most minor mishaps.

Now let’s look at the highest court in the land to see what kind of extra steps it might be taking to prevent lapses in judgement around sensitive documents.

Oh dear, reports CNN, in an exclusive article published this morning that paints a “detailed picture of yearslong lax internal procedures that could have endangered security” including the use of “personal email accounts for sensitive transmissions” by some of the justices themselves, instead of secure servers.

“This has been going on for years,” one former employee told CNN.

Let’s back up a moment. Feverish speculation about security lapses broke out when a draft opinion reversing Roe v. Wade was leaked to Politico, in May last year. An internal investigation began in earnest, led by Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley. Who was the leaker? And what allowed for such a monumental breach?

The report issued by the court last month into what it described as “one of the worst breaches of trust in its history” failed to come up with a culprit.

CNN’s new reporting adds details to that investigation, including the haphazard use of “burn bags” intended for safe document destruction, which were reportedly left open and unattended; remote access that let employees print documents from any computer, making them harder to track; and the use of printers that didn’t produce security logs.

Apparently, part of the problem, according to one CNN source, was resistance from the justices themselves, who “were slow to adopt to the technology”, and employees who were too nervous to confront them.

According to one source quoted by CNN, the justices were “not masters of information security protocol.”

Read the full report here. And as always, people, change your passwords frequently and switch on two-factor authentication.

Don’t just click away.

We need your help. We’re halfway through our Summer Membership Drive, and only $35,000 toward our $200,000 goal. But there’s good news: This week only, every donation will be doubled, up to $50,000, thanks to a generous reader.

That’s twice the impact for intrepid reporting that peels back the layers to publish the truth—and the context you need to break it all down. It’s twice the fuel for investigations on voting rights and justice, critical in this midterm election year. And it’s twice the power for exposing the chaos and corruption of a White House trying to control the narrative.

This is a pivotal moment in our nation, with democracy on the line, and we can only do this work because readers like you step up. Every donation, of any amount, makes a difference here. And every donation will be doubled.

We cannot do this work without you. Join the fight. Double your donation to defend democracy.

Don’t just click away.

We need your help. We’re halfway through our Summer Membership Drive, and only $35,000 toward our $200,000 goal. But there’s good news: This week only, every donation will be doubled, up to $50,000, thanks to a generous reader.

That’s twice the impact for intrepid reporting that peels back the layers to publish the truth—and the context you need to break it all down. It’s twice the fuel for investigations on voting rights and justice, critical in this midterm election year. And it’s twice the power for exposing the chaos and corruption of a White House trying to control the narrative.

This is a pivotal moment in our nation, with democracy on the line, and we can only do this work because readers like you step up. Every donation, of any amount, makes a difference here. And every donation will be doubled.

We cannot do this work without you. Join the fight. Double your donation to defend democracy.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate