For Years, Trump Has Evaded Trial for Sexual Assault. That Changes Today.

The civil suit centers around writer E. Jean Carroll’s allegations that Trump raped her in the mid-’90s.

Mother Jones; Seth Wenig/AP; Eva Deitch/The Washington Post/Getty

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

Six and a half years ago, the tape that should have ended his political career was published by the Washington Post, and Donald Trump survived it. “I just start kissing them. It’s like a magnet. Just kiss. I don’t even wait,” Trump famously told Billy Bush, his words caught by a hot mic as the men leered out a bus window at a soap opera actress. “And when you’re a star, they let you do it,” Trump said. “You can do anything.”

“Whatever you want,” Bush said.

“Grab them by the pussy. You can do anything,” Trump said.

When Trump, onstage at a presidential debate two days later, said he had never kissed or groped any woman without consent, his denial opened the floodgates: Within weeks, more than a dozen women had come forward forward with stories of Trump sexually assaulting them. But the barrage of allegations—which were not the first such claims against Trump—seemed to simply bounce off the real estate magnate as he barreled his way to the presidency. In the years since, despite multiple lawsuits, Trump has never had to face trial over any of the allegations.

That changes today. 

This morning, in a downtown Manhattan courthouse, lawyers will select anonymous jurors to decide an explosive, high-profile lawsuit filed against Trump by E. Jean Carroll, a writer and advice columnist who says he raped her in a department store dressing room in the mid-90s. Carroll first sued Trump in 2019, a few months after she raised allegations amounting to a claim of first-degree rape in a book excerpt published by New York magazine. “The moment the dressing-room door is closed, [Trump] lunges at me, pushes me against the wall, hitting my head quite badly, and puts his mouth against my lips,” Carroll wrote. “He seizes both my arms and pushes me up against the wall a second time, and, as I become aware of how large he is, he holds me against the wall with his shoulder and jams his hand under my coat dress and pulls down my tights.”

She continued: “The next moment, still wearing correct business attire, shirt, tie, suit jacket, overcoat, he opens the overcoat, unzips his pants, and, forcing his fingers around my private area, thrusts his penis halfway—or completely, I’m not certain—inside me.”

Trump immediately and repeatedly denied the allegations. He’s called her a “liar” and “mentally sick,” claiming she made up her story to sell books. He’s also said that he’s never met Carroll (a 1987 photograph shows them together), and that she was “not his type” (when presented with the aforementioned photograph during a deposition, Trump confused her for his ex-wife, Marla Maples).

While Carroll did not make a police report in the 1990s, and the statute of limitations on any criminal case has since expired, her 2019 lawsuit accused the then-president of defamation, arguing that he falsely smeared her when he called her a liar. That case dragged on for years as Trump pursued almost every possible appeal and delay, trying to get the Department of Justice to defend him, and otherwise shielding himself using the trappings of the presidency. Then Carroll sued him again in November 2022, using a newly passed New York State law that opened a one-year “lookback window” for adult survivors of sexual assault to file lawsuits against alleged perpetrators or institutions that enabled abuse. 

It’s that second lawsuit—alleging both battery and defamation—that goes to trial today. But it’s not just Carroll’s story that will be presented to the anonymous jury. Two women who came forward after Trump’s debate denial will also get to testify, US District Court Judge Lewis Kaplan ruled earlier this spring. One of the women, Jessica Leeds, told the New York Times that Trump kissed her and groped her without consent while sitting next to her on an airplane three decades earlier. The other, former People magazine reporter Natasha Stoynoff, wrote about Trump kissing and groping her without consent in 2005, when she was visiting Mar-a-Lago to write a profile about his and Melania’s first wedding anniversary.

No DNA evidence will be presented or even discussed at trial, despite much prior speculation about the possibility that Trump left genetic material on a dress that Carroll said she’d kept, unwashed, since the alleged encounter. According to Carroll’s legal team, testing reportedly discovered male DNA on the dress. But because Trump did not submit to DNA testing that could have been compared to the sample, even mentioning the possibility of such evidence could taint the jury, Judge Kaplan ruled in March.

It’s not clear yet whether Trump will actually face any of his accusers in person. His lawyer informed the judge last week that the former president had not yet decided whether to appear at the courthouse (he isn’t legally required to). The trial is unfolding at a particularly dire moment for Trump, who pleaded not guilty earlier this month on 34 felony counts of falsifying business records and faces other possible indictments in Washington and Georgia. Earlier this month, Trump tried to delay the trial in Carroll’s case yet again, arguing that potential jurors needed a “cooling off period” amid all the news of his legal woes. 

“At least some portion of the recent media coverage of Mr. Trump’s indictment was of his own doing,” Judge Kaplan wrote in response, denying the delay request

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate