Judge Rejects Trump’s Request for a Mistrial in E. Jean Carroll Case

The former president’s lawyer had alleged that the judge was biased.

In this courtroom sketch, E. Jean Carroll, right, is cross examined by Former President Donald Trump's defense attorney Joe Tacopina, left, in federal court in New York, Thursday, April 27, 2023. Trump's lawyer went on the attack Thursday against writer Carroll's claims that she was raped by Trump in the 1990s, using cross examination to try to discredit the longtime advice columnist before a jury at a New York civil trial. Elizabeth Williams/AP

Fight disinformation: Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily newsletter and follow the news that matters.

The judge in Donald Trump’s civil rape and defamation trial denied a request by the former president’s attorney to grant a mistrial in the case on Monday. The motion, which was filed Sunday night by Trump attorney Joe Tacopina, amounted to a laundry list of complaints that Judge Lewis Kaplan hadn’t been fair to Tacopina, especially on Thursday of last week. Kaplan did spend much of that day correcting and interrupting Tacopina as he attempted to cross-examine writer E. Jean Carroll, who has accused Trump of raping her in 1996 in a dressing room at the Bergdorf Goodman department store in New York City. Although Carroll has acknowledged some potential gaps in her story—for example she does not remember the exact date—Tacopina struggled to get Carroll to flinch from her version of the incident, which Trump denies ever happened.

Tacopina’s letter to the judge on Sunday was a summation of his problems in court on Thursday.

Among other things, Tacopina complained that Kaplan had mischaractarized evidence to the jury; that Kaplan had agreed too often with Carroll’s attorney’s objections that Tacopina was being too argumentative; and that Kaplan had warned Tacopina that Trump might face jury-tampering charges if he and his children continued to post inflammatory things about the case on social media. 

The latter compliant stems from a back-and-forth between Kaplan and Tacopina on Wednesday, in which the judge scolded Tacopina for posts on Truth Social that Trump had made in which he brought up the possibility of there being DNA evidence that was not being used, which he said was unfair to him—Carroll says she has the dress she wore the day of the alleged assault, but Trump initially refused to submit a DNA sample. Trump also complained that LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman is paying for Carroll’s legal team. Both subjects—the possibility of DNA evidence existing and Hoffman’s involvement—were declared off-limits to talk about in front of the jury, and Kaplan said he was concerned that Trump’s posts were designed to reach the jury’s eyes. When Eric Trump followed up with Twitter posts about Hoffman, Kaplan warned Tacopina again. 

“Remedies that might be available from this Court may not be the only relevant remedies. If I were in your shoes, I’d be having a conversation with the client,” Kaplan warned Tacopina. “Eric Trump isn’t here before me, so you don’t have to defend Eric Trump. I am simply suggesting to you that there are some relevant United States statutes here and somebody on your side ought to be thinking about them.”

In court, Tacopina had assured Kaplan that he understood the judge’s concerns and that he was indeed thinking about the relevant federal laws. Trump has not posted about the case since the warnings, and Eric Trump subsequently deleted his tweet.

Kaplan denied the request for a mistrial in court Monday, but Tacopina did tell a reporter that he thought the letter had some value. 

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

WE'LL BE BLUNT.

We have a considerable $390,000 gap in our online fundraising budget that we have to close by June 30. There is no wiggle room, we've already cut everything we can, and we urgently need more readers to pitch in—especially from this specific blurb you're reading right now.

We'll also be quite transparent and level-headed with you about this.

In "News Never Pays," our fearless CEO, Monika Bauerlein, connects the dots on several concerning media trends that, taken together, expose the fallacy behind the tragic state of journalism right now: That the marketplace will take care of providing the free and independent press citizens in a democracy need, and the Next New Thing to invest millions in will fix the problem. Bottom line: Journalism that serves the people needs the support of the people. That's the Next New Thing.

And it's what MoJo and our community of readers have been doing for 47 years now.

But staying afloat is harder than ever.

In "This Is Not a Crisis. It's The New Normal," we explain, as matter-of-factly as we can, what exactly our finances look like, why this moment is particularly urgent, and how we can best communicate that without screaming OMG PLEASE HELP over and over. We also touch on our history and how our nonprofit model makes Mother Jones different than most of the news out there: Letting us go deep, focus on underreported beats, and bring unique perspectives to the day's news.

You're here for reporting like that, not fundraising, but one cannot exist without the other, and it's vitally important that we hit our intimidating $390,000 number in online donations by June 30.

And we hope you might consider pitching in before moving on to whatever it is you're about to do next. It's going to be a nail-biter, and we really need to see donations from this specific ask coming in strong if we're going to get there.

payment methods

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

Support our journalism

Help Mother Jones' reporters dig deep with a tax-deductible donation.

Donate