The White House Is Already Walking Back Hundreds of Federal Layoffs

Trump’s cronies fired critical public health workers. Regret set in immediately.

A person holds a "Save the CDC" poster in front of a large blue and white CDC sign on CDC campus

A rally at the main campus of the Centers For Disease Control and Prevention in Atlanta, April 1, 2025.Elijah Nouvelage/Getty

Get your news from a source that’s not owned and controlled by oligarchs. Sign up for the free Mother Jones Daily.

In Donald Trump’s second term, federal workers have gotten used to being fired and re-hired, and, in some cases, even fired again. As one probationary employee at the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) told me earlier this year, working for this administration is “emotionally very turbulent.”

This weekend, scores more federal workers are feeling the whiplash. After Project 2025 architect Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), announced on Friday that the government had started issuing reduction in force (RIF) notices to federal employees more than a week into the ongoing government shutdown, approximately 4,000 federal workers were laid off, as my colleague Tim Murphy wrote yesterday. Reports suggest that the RIFs primarily targeted HUD, the Department of Education, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and the Treasury Department.

But already, hundreds of those fired employees have reportedly been reinstated.

The American Federation of Government Employees (AFGE), a union representing more than 800,000 federal and Washington, DC, government employees, told CNN on Sunday that of the approximately 1,300 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) workers who received RIF notices on Friday, about 700 were reinstated on Saturday. Among the staffers fired and reinstated were those who publish CDC’s weekly Morbidity and Mortality Report, its incident commander for measles response, staff working on the Ebola response in the Democratic Republic of the Congo, and staff at the National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, CNN and Politico report. An anonymous HHS official told some news outlets that these staffers were mistakenly fired through a “coding error.”

To give a sense of the importance of the highly skilled workforce the government accidentally eliminated and is now scrambling to restore, consider what Tim wrote yesterday, before the news had broken of the White H0use walking back hundreds of layoffs:

The CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Report is not just any old morbidity and mortality report—it’s a key part of America’s public health apparatus, something that has been published in some form by the government for almost 150 years. The most recent edition is titled, “Tularemia Antimicrobial Treatment and Prophylaxis: CDC Recommendations for Naturally Acquired Infections and Bioterrorism Response.” I don’t know what that means, but it doesn’t sound like the kind of public-health information you want to outsource to TikTok.

So the un-firing of these people generally seems like a good thing. But as former CDC senior official Dr. Demetre Daskalakis told the New York Times on Saturday, the harms of the government’s slapdash approach cannot be entirely undone. “I’m happy people are back,” Daskalakis told the newspaper, “but this damage is not easy to repair both for current staff and for people who will lead public health in the future.”

On CBS’ Face the Nation on Sunday, Vice President JD Vance told host Margaret Brennan that the layoffs were the Democrats’ fault, and said the shutdown “inevitably leads to some chaos,” which he also blamed on Democrats.

The AFGE also said in a post on X that it had filed a lawsuit in response to the RIFs. A spokesperson for the union, and spokespeople for the White House and HHS, did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Sunday.

What’s independent journalism worth to you?

Our news will always be free to read, watch, and listen to online. But what is its value?

Unbiased reporting on the issues that billionaire-owned newsrooms won’t touch. Fearless research into the dark corners of government and corporations. Ferociously fact-checked news that focuses on the facts, and the facts alone.

It IS free for you and every reader, viewer, and listener to utilize. But it’s not free for our team to make. So, what’s it worth to you? Let us know by making a donation: Make a one-time donation today to support this work. Or make a monthly sustaining donation to help us plan for the future.

Whatever you choose, know that you’re supporting more independent, investigative journalism in a time when we need it most.

What’s independent journalism worth to you?

Our news will always be free to read, watch, and listen to online. But what is its value?

Unbiased reporting on the issues that billionaire-owned newsrooms won’t touch. Fearless research into the dark corners of government and corporations. Ferociously fact-checked news that focuses on the facts, and the facts alone.

It IS free for you and every reader, viewer, and listener to utilize. But it’s not free for our team to make. So, what’s it worth to you? Let us know by making a donation: Make a one-time donation today to support this work. Or make a monthly sustaining donation to help us plan for the future.

Whatever you choose, know that you’re supporting more independent, investigative journalism in a time when we need it most.

We Recommend

Latest

Sign up for our free newsletter

Subscribe to the Mother Jones Daily to have our top stories delivered directly to your inbox.

Get our award-winning magazine

Save big on a full year of investigations, ideas, and insights.

Subscribe

INDEPENDENT. BECAUSE OF YOU.

Mother Jones has no billionaires calling the shots—just readers like you making fearless reporting possible

Donate